My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9605
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
9605
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:36 PM
Creation date
5/20/2009 3:22:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9605
Author
Schmidt, J. C. and e. al.
Title
Flow Recommendations for the White River, Utah-Colorado Draft Report.
USFW Year
2002.
USFW - Doc Type
Logan, UT.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
135
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />increased and eddies decreased. <br /> <br />Adult Colorado pikeminnow habitat was estimated for three sets of habitat suitability <br /> <br />criteria and applied to the White River physical habitat simulation at discharges ranging from <br /> <br />0.028 to 17.0 m3/s (1-600 fe/s). The first criterion used White River data from previous studies. <br /> <br />It showed an almost linear increase in usable habitat as flows increased from 0.028 to 17.0 m3/s. <br /> <br />The second criterion used night foraging data from the Yampa River (1996 and 1997). It showed <br /> <br />usable habitat area almost identical to that of the White River data, the result of similar suitability <br /> <br />indices for depth and velocity. The third criterion was for daytime resting fish, also developed <br /> <br />from Yampa River data. This showed low usable habitat score for all White River flows. This <br /> <br />was the result of the Yampa River data showing daytime use of pools and runs> 1.2 m deep; <br /> <br />however, these depths were rare in the White River. White River Colorado pikeminnow <br /> <br />apparently found suitable daytime resting areas in other habitats < 1.2 m deep, e.g., undercut <br /> <br />banks and within channel structure. <br /> <br />The riffle surface area-discharge relationship was nearly linear for all flows examined, <br /> <br />and thus no curve break was identified. The wetted perimeter-discharge relationship, however, <br /> <br /> <br />was non-linear and increased rapidly with discharge between 0.028 and 4.24 m3/s (1 - 150 fe/s) <br /> <br /> <br />and then gradually approached a plateau near 14.2 m3/s (500 fe/s) before again increasing at 15.6 <br /> <br /> <br />m3/s (550 fe/s). Curve break analysis found that at discharges below of 4.2 m3/s wetted <br /> <br />perimeter decreased rapidly. Curve breaks were also calculated for width, depth, and velocity <br /> <br />and yielded values similar to that of wetted perimeter. <br /> <br />Historical White River discharge during the base flow period (August-October) 1923 <br /> <br />through 1997 dropped below 5.7 m3/s (200 fe/s) less than 5% of the time and below 4.2 m3/s less <br /> <br />7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.