My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9605
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
9605
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:36 PM
Creation date
5/20/2009 3:22:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9605
Author
Schmidt, J. C. and e. al.
Title
Flow Recommendations for the White River, Utah-Colorado Draft Report.
USFW Year
2002.
USFW - Doc Type
Logan, UT.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
135
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />transported in the White River was moved as a pulse of mobilized bedload material. <br /> <br />Whereas the bed scoured at higher discharges in most of the measured cross sections, <br /> <br />aggradation occurred near the coarsest cobble bars. Aggradation ofthe bed in these regions <br /> <br />could be due to finer material moving over the more stable coarse material, which suggested the <br /> <br />occurrence of selective transport. Other studies found that transport of finer bed material <br /> <br />occurred at discharges below bankfull stage in several coarse-bedded rivers. The channel of the <br /> <br />White River within the study reach was made of both fine-grained and gravel deposits. While <br /> <br />some of our evidence suggested that a threshold of equal mobility was reached near 41 m3/s <br /> <br />(1,450 fe/s), it was more likely that selective transport ofthe finer deposits occurred at this <br /> <br />discharge. Both the aggradation of the bed at higher discharges in very coarse bedded areas of <br /> <br />the stream, and a peak in the sediment transport curve at 14 m3/s (500 fe/s), suggested that finer <br /> <br />sediments were transported selectively at low discharges. <br /> <br />Base flow/low flow recommendation: The purpose of this study was to identify the base <br /> <br />flow needs of endangered fish, i.e., adult Colorado pikeminnow, in the White River. Two <br /> <br />approaches were used: 1) protection of Colorado pikeminnow habitat and 2) protection of riffle <br /> <br />habitat to maintain biological productivity. Both methods used physical habitat simulations to <br /> <br />estimate changes in macrohabitat (pool, run, eddy, and riffles) and microhabitat (depth, velocity, <br /> <br />substrate, and cover) changes that resulted from changing flows. Curve break analysis was used <br /> <br />to identify the flow below which the greatest rate of habitat change occurred. <br /> <br />Study results showed that most of the habitats in the White River consisted of riffles and <br /> <br />runs, and pools and eddies were secondary components. Habitat proportions remained constant <br /> <br />as discharge ranged from 4.2 to 17.0 m3/s (150 - 600 fe/s) ; below 4.2 m3/s (150 fe/s), riffles <br /> <br />6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.