Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Propagation and Genetics Management <br /> <br />Burke, T. <br /> <br />Bureau of Reclamation, Boulder City, NV <br /> <br />Lake Mohave Razorback Sucker Program Update. During the late 1980's, over 90% of the <br />wild, adult razorback sucker population left in the world, roughly 63,000 fish, resided in Lake <br />Mohave. Despinte annual spawning along the lake's shoreline, natural recruitment of new fish into <br />the population was almost nonexistent due to predation from nonnative fishes. Razorback suckers <br />live about 40-45 years, and Lake Mohave was formed in the early 1950's. Without help, this <br />population was expected to die offaround the turn of the century. The Native Fish Work Group <br />has been working since 1991 to replace this stock. The NFWG is a team of fishery biologists <br />representing Arizona Game and Fish, Nevada Division of Wildlife, National Park Service, <br />Geological Survey, Fish and Wildlife Service and Bureau of Reclamation. The team collects <br />young fry from the early spring spawning and transfers them to a local hatchery where they are <br />raised to approximately 4 inches. The young fish are then moved to lakeside ponds for further <br />rearing. When the fish reach 10-12 inches in length, they are tagged and released into the main <br />body ofthe reservoir. The Native Fish Work Group's goal is to build up the spawning population <br />to 50,000 adult fish. To date, over 52,000 juvenile fish have been repatriated to the lake, and an <br />additional 117,000 are at some stage of rearing to target release size. An overview of the program <br />is presented, along with results to date. <br /> <br />Mueller, G. <br /> <br />us. Geological Survey <br /> <br />Are the razorback suckers we're stocking, couch potatoes? Post stocking drift and low <br />survival of razorback sucker continues to plague reintroduction efforts. The author discusses <br />environmental, behavioral, and physiological factors that influences fish performance and survival. <br />Stocking dispersal (30 d) of 8 test groups (15 fish each) of razorback sucker was examined using <br />telemetric equipment. Fish were released in three different locations: (1) a reservoir (Lake <br />Powell), (2) a small seasonal backwater (Green River) and (3) a large backwater (> 10 ha) on the <br />lower Colorado River, near Laughlin, Nevada. Subgroups were also released (1) immediately, (2) <br />site acclimated 3 to 7 days prior to release, and (3) large backwater subgroups included fish <br />physically conditioned to flow. Post-stocking dispersal was rapid and declined with time for all <br />tests. Most movement was detected 3 weeks following release. Dispersal in the Green River was <br />pronounced (5<=69.5 k/month) and significantly (Kruskal-Wallis P<O.OI) greater than either the <br />reservoir (5<=3.73 k/month) or large backwater (x=7.72 k/month) groups. Fish were found in <br />slack water habitats that provided adequate cover. Site-acclimation tests were inconclusive but <br />downstream dispersal was significantly (Wilcoxon P<0.05) less for flow-conditioned fish (x=1.89 <br />k/month) compared to unconditioned fish (x=7.73 k/month). Data suggests razorback sucker <br />dispersal can be significantly reduced if fish are preconditioned to flow and stocked in moderately <br />large (> 1 0 ha) backwater habitats. <br /> <br />17 <br />