Laserfiche WebLink
<br />morphologically variable cyprinid species native to the Colorado River drainage. All three <br />members of this complex, G. cypha, G. elegans, and G. robusta occur (or occurred) in the Yampa <br />River Canyon. Both G. elegans and G. cypha are federally listed as endangered, with the former <br />likely extirpated from the Yampa River; only G. robusta is still unlisted and relatively common <br />although it is a candidate for listing. Growth rates based on valid age determinations, as well as <br />other life history aspects, are poorly known for G. robusta, and indeed for all three species. <br />Consequently, in addition to providing information directly on G. robusta, this species may be <br />considered a surrogate to better understand growth patterns of G. elegans and G. cypha. Gila <br />robusta have been collected during July in 1998, 1999, and 2001 by angling (1998) and <br />electro fishing (1999, 2001) in the Yampa River Canyon in Dinosaur National Park. Presumed <br />ages determined from otoliths, opercle bones, and scales all show significant correlations. <br />However, otoliths and opercles show the highest correlations. Compared to both otoliths and <br />opercle bones, scales underestimate ages for fish greater than seven years. Based on data from <br />1999 (n=28), median ages were 6, 6, and 5, and maximum ages were 18, 11, and 8, based on <br />otoliths, opercles, and scales, respectively. Using otolith data, growth trajectories of males and <br />females diverge for fish older than 10 years, with females showing greater increases in length and <br />mass than males. <br /> <br />Snyder, D. E. <br /> <br />Larval Fish Laboratory, Colorado State University, Ft. Collins, CO <br /> <br />Computer-Interactive Key to Sucker Larvae and Early Juveniles of the Upper Colorado <br />River Basin. The detailed descriptions and 60 pages of keys in the Colorado Division of Wildlife <br />(CDOW) guide to Upper Colorado River Basin sucker larvae and early juveniles (Snyder and <br />Muth 1990) have served the Recovery Program and research community well, but they need to be <br />updated with character range extensions observed since publication and expanded to include <br />longnose sucker. However, intricate printed keys such as these are very difficult to prepare, <br />correct, update, or expand to cover additional species because each change cascades through <br />most subsequent portions of the key. Also, users of the very long and intricate keys have found it <br />formidable and inflexible. As a modem alternative, I've decided to replace the printed key with a <br />computer-interactive key because it is much easier to prepare, update, and expand, and users will <br />find it a much more flexible and user-friendly taxonomic tool. Among other advantages, users can <br />limit consideration to a subset of species when appropriate and bypass characters that are <br />unfamiliar, difficult to accurately measure or observe, or that happen to be damaged on the <br />specimen of concern. With this presentation I will discuss and demonstrate a preliminary version <br />of the new key. <br /> <br />16 <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />