Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Introduction <br /> <br />Electrofishing is a commonly used sampling method that can harm fish. Most <br />studies on adverse effects of electrofishing have investigated short-term mortality or spinal <br />and soft-tissue injuries in yearling or older fish (e.g. Spencer 1967; Sharber and Carothers <br />1988; Holmes et al. 1990; Sharber et al. 1994). Although spawning fish are sometimes <br />targeted for electrofishing, relatively little is known about impacts of electric fields on <br />reproduction, gametes, or subsequent offspring (Snyder 1992). Lamarque (1990) noted that <br />information on effects of electrofishing currents on early life stages of fish is sparse and <br />limited primarily to salmonid embryos, but he suggested that electric fields detrimental to <br />adult fish would probably also harm young. Exposure to electrofishing currents caused <br />significantly lower survival in embryos of salmonids (Godfrey 1957; Dwyer et a!. 1993; <br />Dwyer and Erdahl 1995) and walleye Stizostedion vitreum (Newman and Stone 1992). <br />The largest extant riverine population of federally endangered razorback sucker <br />Xyrauchen texanus occurs in the middle Green River system of northeastern Utah and <br />northwestern Colorado, but number of adults is low and recruitment is minimal (Lanigan and <br />Tyus 1989; USFWS 1991). Successful reproduction by this population has only recently <br />been confirmed through collection of larvae (R.T. Muth, unpublished data) and early <br />juveniles (Guttermuth et a!. 1994). Sampling for adult razorback sucker is most successful <br />in spring when fish aggregate to spawn, and electrofishing over known spawning areas in <br />the Green and Yampa rivers is effective (Tyus 1987; Tyus and Karp 1990). However, there <br />are concerns within the Recovery Implementation Program for Endangered Fish Species in <br />the Upper Colorado River Basin that electrofishing of spawning aggregations might harm <br />adults and reduce their reproductive success. Muth and Ruppert (in press) assessed <br />effects of electrofishing currents on captive ripe razorback sucker and subsequent egg <br />hatching success. Our objective in this study was to conduct laboratory tests to determine if <br />electroshock by pulsed DC at selected pulse frequencies and peak-voltage gradients <br />affected survival of razorback sucker embryos and survival and growth of early larvae. <br /> <br />Methods <br /> <br />Razorback sucker eggs at 28 h postfertilization were obtained from Dexter National <br />Fish Hatchery and Technology Center, New Mexico, and placed in a flow-through incubator <br />receiving well water at 17.60C. Samples of eggs were removed from the incubator at hourly <br />intervals and examined under a stereo-zoom dissecting microscope to determine <br />developmental state of embryos. Embryos were exposed to treatment conditions at early <br />epiboly (33 h postfertilization), early tailbud (78 h), or finfold (122 h) developmental stages; <br />stages were identified following descriptions by Minckley and Gustafson (1982). Eggs not <br />used in the experiment on embryos were allowed to hatch, and larvae were treated at 36 h <br />posthatching, about 96 h before swimup. <br />Electric systems were powered by a Honda'" model EG5000X, 5000-W, 240-V <br />generator. Alternating current from the generator was transformed to square-wave pulsed <br />DC by a Coffelt" WP-15 or Coffelt Mark 20 Complex Pulse System (CPS™) electrofishing <br />control unit. Treatment settings for the WP-15 were 30 Hz and 12% duty cycle (4-ms <br />pulses), 60 Hz and 24% duty cycle (4-ms pulses), or 80 Hz and 40% duty cycle (5-ms <br />pulses). Settings at 60 Hz and 24% duty cycle are commonly used with the WP-15 in boat <br />electrofishing for adult razorback sucker in the middle Green River system (E. Wick, U.S. <br /> <br />6 <br />