Laserfiche WebLink
<br />~ <br /> <br />conditions available for algal colonization and <br />growth. Consequently, algal communities are good <br />indicators of stream health and can serve as im- <br />portant biological monitors. The variation in com- <br />munity composition that exists among subhabitats <br />within streams and among individual streams <br />(Douglas 1958; Krecji and Lowe 1986; Pringle <br />1987) can be uSed as a tool to understand problems <br />that exist within the watershed. Variation in com- <br />munity composition can be attributed to differ- <br />ences in the nutrient availability of surface waters <br />(Eminson and Moss 1980), size and biological ac- <br />tivity of substrata (Miller et al. 1987; Carlton and <br />Wetzel 1988), and substrate type (Stevenson and <br />Hashim 1989). <br />In situ algal bioassays were conducted at one <br />mainstem and four tributary sites in 1990. Bioas- <br />says were done with nutrient-diffusing artificial <br />substrata similar to those of Fairchild and Lowe <br />(1984). Sites were chosen that were similar in <br />water velocity and shading. Four potentially lim- <br />iting nutrient treatments and a control were at- <br />tached to a 1.5-m-long, 2- x 6-cm board (Bushong <br />and Bachmann 1989). Six boards were placed at <br />each site, 10-15mapart.After7 days, three boards <br />at each site were randomly chosen and analyzed <br />for periphyton. The three remaining boards were <br />removed and periphyton sampled after 14 days. <br />Chlorophyll a, organic weight, inorganic weight, <br />and fine sediment accumulation were measured in <br />the laboratory. Turbidity, water velocity, and <br />maximum-minimum temperatures were moni- <br />tored at each site. <br />The proportion of the substrate composed of <br />particles less than 2.4 mm in diameter ranged <br />between 47 and 1000Al in mainstem sites and be- <br />tween 33 and 75% in tributary sites. Iwamoto et al. <br />(1978) and Rivier and Sequier (1985) stated that <br />the presence and addition of fine sediments <br />(<2.4 mm) to lotic systems can have strong effects <br />on biotic communities and functional parameters. <br />Existing algal communities were identified on <br />hard substrates at six sites. Thirty-nine taxa of <br />diatoms, green algae, and bluegreen algae were <br />found. Diatoms were dominant at all sites (66- <br />92%), represented by 16 taxa. The most abundant <br />diatoms were Cyclotella spp. and various pen- <br />nates. Twenty-three algal taxa were identified. <br />The most abundant were the green algae Ankis- <br />trodesmus spp., and Scenodesmus spp. <br />The greatest differences among the sites seemed <br />to be partly attributable to available substrate con- <br />ditions. Sites with a diversity of substrates ranging <br /> <br />CHRISTOPHER M. KAVANAUGH 13 <br /> <br />from cobble and gravel to detritus and woody debris <br />had a greater diversity of algal taxa. <br />The relative influence of nutrients on algal pro- <br />duction in this study was low. The phosphorus and <br />nitrogen-phosphorus treatments had statistically <br />significant stimulatory effects on chlorophyll a <br />and biomass accrual; but the overall effect was <br />small. Water chemistry data indicate that the <br />streams all have relatively high concentrations of <br />nitrates and phosphorus, but N:P ratios varied <br />considerably. <br />The variation in overall algal biomass and pro- <br />duction among sites may be attributed to differ- <br />ences in quantity of available colonists, and conse- <br />quent colonization and deposition of algal <br />material. Other studies of midwestern streams <br />have implicated water temperature and light as <br />being more important than nutrients in controlling <br />algal production (Bushong and Bachmann 1989; <br />Munn et al. 1989). Water temperatures did not <br />vary more than 30 C during this study and did not <br />seem to be a controlling factor. However, because <br />of the high levels of turbidity, light may have been <br />limiting. Turbidity values recorded were as high or <br />higher than values observed by Munn et al. (1989) <br />to impair algal production (>10 NTU). In addition <br />to the reduction of light, suspended sediments <br />accumulated directly on the artificial substrates. <br />There were also at least two storm events that <br />carried elevated sediment loads that could have <br />scoured algae from the test substrates. <br />Sampling and analysis of algal communities is <br />continuing at 20 sites on minor watersheds. Devel- <br />opment of diverse periphyton communities <br />throughout the Minnesota River basin seems to be <br />limited by lack of stable substrates, high turbidity, <br />high sediment loads, and predominance of fine <br />sediments. <br /> <br />Macroinvertebrates <br /> <br />Benthic macroinvertebrates are important indi- <br />cators of water quality (Hynes 1970). Aquatic <br />macroinvertebrates are found in nearly all stream <br />habitats and display a wide variety of functional <br />feeding characteristics (Merritt and Cummins <br />1984). Environmental requirements and pollution <br />tolerance information are available for most taxa. <br />These factors make aquatic macroinvertebrate in- <br />dices useful in assessing water quality. <br />Macroinvertebrate data from the Minnesota <br />River have been collected by several investigators <br />over the years (Kirsch et al. 1985). Previous inves- <br />tigations focused on only a small portion of the <br />