Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />consumptive use requirements of Colorado River mainstream users in the Lower Division <br />States are expected to be more than 9,250 MCM (7.5 MAP), the surplus condition is the <br />criterion governing the operation of Lake Mead for calendar year 1997 in accordance with <br />Article ID(3)(b) of the Operating Criteria and Article TI(B)(2) of the decree in Arizona v. <br />California. <br /> <br />Nothing in the decree in Arizona ~ California prohibits the Secretary of the Interior from <br />releasing water apportioned, but unused, in any Lower Division State for that year for <br />consumptive use in any other Lower Division State. No rights to the recurrent use of such <br />water acaue by reason of the use of such water. In light of this provision and in accordance <br />with Article TI(B)(6) of the decree, any Lower Division State will be allowed to utilize water <br />apportioned to, but unused by, another Lower Division State in calendar year 1997. <br /> <br />16 <br />