My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9676
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
9676
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:37 PM
Creation date
5/20/2009 2:54:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9676
Author
U.S. Department of the Interior.
Title
Preliminary Analysis
USFW Year
2001.
USFW - Doc Type
Wayne N. Aspinall Unit Operations and the Draft Endangered Fish Flow Recommendations for the Gunnison and Colorado Rivers.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
47
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Attachment A <br /> <br />RiverWare Hydrology Model Background <br /> <br />RiverWare is a software modeling tool developed by CADSWES (University of Colorado) for the Bureau <br />of Reclamation and the Tennessee Valley Authority for operation and planning studies of river basins and <br />river systems. A daily planning model of the Gunnison River was developed using the RiverWare <br />modeling software. The model includes the Gunnison River Basin from Blue Mesa Reservoir to the <br />confluence with the Colorado River. The modeling period runs from January 1975 through December <br />2000. <br /> <br />The model separates reservoir operations into 3 time periods: January-March, April-July, and August- <br />December. Basic daily inputs to the model are: historic Blue Mesa inflows, both actual and unregulated; <br />historic side inflows to Morrow Point and Crystal; Gunnison Tunnel diversions; and various downstream <br />gains computed from actual gage data. Other data provided as input to the model include forecasted <br />inflow and tunnel demands for each forecast period. <br /> <br />Forecast data, both reservoir inflow and tunnel demand, is for the current forecast period and can be input <br />on any day, generally on the first day of the month and then again on the fifteenth, if available. Forecast <br />data for the last month of the forecast period generally has to be adjusted (sometimes daily) to reflect that <br />as the end of a forecast period is approached, there is nearly 100 percent accuracy. The model determines <br />remaining forecasted inflow and demand by subtracting the int10ws or demands to date from the most <br />recent forecast data available. Remaining minimum canyon demands, which include trout spawning and <br />incubation flows. are computed at various times in the model since these demands are dependent upon <br />flOws that occur during the model run. <br /> <br />The flow recommendations are for a point at Whitewater on the river system about 80 miles downstream <br />of the Aspinall Unit. Flow recommendations vary on the type of water year forecast. Six different <br />recommended flow hydro graphs for this point on the river have been developed using the information <br />contained in the "Flow Recommendation to Benefit Endangered Fishes in the Colorado and Gunnison <br />Rivers", March 2001. This report identified a 2 day peak flow with shoulder flows and base flows under <br />different hydrologic conditions. Tributaries between the Aspinall Unit and the Whitewater gage <br />(measuring point) provide a portion of the recommended flow. <br /> <br />The Flow Recommendation Report indicates a peak flow should occur between May 15th and June 15th. <br />Preliminary analysis of tributary peak flows during May indicate that making peak releases from the <br />Aspinall Unit between May 20-22 would provide the best chance of matching the tributary peak and <br />reduce the volume of water released specifically for the recommended flows. An estimate of the unmet <br />portion ofthe recommended flow hydrograph for each year was computed outside the RiverWare Model <br />using estimated hydro graphs for the tributaries. The flow recommendation demand hydro graph was <br />input as a demand in the canyon immediately below the Aspinall Unit. The flow recommendation <br />demand hydro graph is included as a downstream demand on Aspinall and is included as part of the total <br />canyon demands. Because the demand hydro graph is based on estimated tributary hydrographs, the <br />recommended flow at Whitewater may be exceeded or not entirely met depending on the accuracy of the <br />projected tributary flows. <br /> <br />A -1-' <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.