My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9676
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
9676
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:37 PM
Creation date
5/20/2009 2:54:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9676
Author
U.S. Department of the Interior.
Title
Preliminary Analysis
USFW Year
2001.
USFW - Doc Type
Wayne N. Aspinall Unit Operations and the Draft Endangered Fish Flow Recommendations for the Gunnison and Colorado Rivers.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
47
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Compact - The effects of operating the Aspinall Unit to provide flow recommendations have not been <br />analyzed for impact on Colorado's entitlement to its share of the Colorado River. Generally, the <br />recommended t10ws reduce the frequency of filling Blue Mesa and would reduce the potential for <br />Colorado to develop water supplies. <br /> <br />Conclusions and Recommendations <br /> <br />Under current operating criteria and forecasting methods used in the modeling (including estimates of <br />tributary flow), draft flow recommendations ate not fully met. However, modeling results show <br />recommended peaks, base flows, and minimum fish passage flows can be met more frequently. <br />Operating for flow recommendations impacts storage levels in Blue Mesa which would reduce the <br />dependable yield of the reservoir for Colorado uses and reservoir related fisheries and recreation. <br />Downstream flooding could increase under the flow recommendations but other downstream resources <br />such as recreation and fisheries would be protected to a reasonable degree. To intentionally operate the <br />Aspinall Unit outside existing criteria, in certain instances, could put the structural integrity of the dams <br />at risk and increase the potential for flooding. <br /> <br />Operating criteria would need to be adjusted and storage releases increased to more fully meet the flow <br />recommendations. Structural modifications, including additional outlet works, could be required to <br />safely operate the Aspinall Unit facilities to meet flow flow recommendations at the frequencies <br />recommended for the endangered fish. <br /> <br />Reclamation plans to complete an EIS on alternative operations to help meet the endangered fish <br />recommendations when the recommendations are finalized. The existing model to analyze the flows will <br />be upgraded and integrated with State resources to assess impacts to other water users in this process. <br />Reclamation should work with the FWS to refine criteria to better meet flow recommendations and <br />reduce impacts. Impacts of operations on various resources should be addressed through negotiations, <br />the reserved right quantification process, and in the NEP A process. An important decision, to be made in <br />cooperation with Colorado, is needed on how much of the Aspinall Unit water yield can be impacted to <br />meet flow recommendations. <br /> <br />17 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.