My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9676
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
9676
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:37 PM
Creation date
5/20/2009 2:54:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9676
Author
U.S. Department of the Interior.
Title
Preliminary Analysis
USFW Year
2001.
USFW - Doc Type
Wayne N. Aspinall Unit Operations and the Draft Endangered Fish Flow Recommendations for the Gunnison and Colorado Rivers.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
47
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Flood Control <br /> <br />The Water Control ManuaP for Blue Mesa Reservoir indicates that releases should notcause the flows of <br />the Gunnison River at Delta to exceed 15,000 cfs unless necessary. The City of Delta has indicated that <br />they begin to experience flooding at flows of approximately 12,000 cfs. The following table shows the <br />number of days various flows were exceeded at Delta during the 26 year study period. <br /> <br /> Number of Davs Flows at Delta were Exceeded <br /> Run A RunB Rune RunD <br />Flows at Delta Baseline FWS 5000 FWS 6500 FWS UNL TD <br />12,000 cfs 71 81 84 84 <br />13,000 36 48 49 49 <br />14,000 15 27 29 29 <br />15,000 9 13 13 13 <br />17,000 2 5 5 5 <br />19,000 0 2 2 2 <br /> <br />The table above shows increasing releases during May, in an attempt to meet the peak flow <br />recommendations, increases the frequency of flows above 12,000 and 15,000 cfs at Delta. <br /> <br />Reclamation would be taking risks when creating spring peaks. If the inflow forecast were overestimated <br />and the recommended spring releases were made, Blue Mesa might not fill. If the inflow forecast were <br />underestimated and water for a spring peak were retained in Blue Mesa, it might become necessary to <br />release water that causes flooding at Delta. This is a concern because Reclamation may not be able to <br />respond to rapid changes in hydrologic conditions. Reclamation would monitor such operations and <br />make adjustments as necessary to balance competing needs. <br /> <br />These model results are not intended to predict exact or specific flooding impacts on Delta, but provide a <br />general indication of flooding impact potential. General observations from model runs indicate that <br />flooding at Delta may be increased under the conditions summarized in the following table: <br /> <br /> <br />Potential for Flooding at Delta, Colorado <br /> <br />Wet <br />(Upper 10% category) <br /> <br />Moderately Wet to Wet <br />(Upper 10% - 30% category) <br /> <br />equal toOT greater than <br />forecast <br /> <br />increased <br /> <br />equal to or greater than <br />forecast <br /> <br />increased <br /> <br />3Reclamation and the U.S. ArmyCorps of Engineers document dated February 1988. <br /> <br />13 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.