Laserfiche WebLink
<br />W05415 <br /> <br />WOODHOUSE ET AL.: UPDATED COLORADO RIVER RECONSTRUCTIONS <br /> <br />W05415 <br /> <br />Bluff; and the full Upper Colorado River at Lees Ferry <br />(available online at http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/paleo/pubs/ <br />woodhouse2006/woodhouse2006.html). These reconstruc- <br />tions span the common years IS69 to 1997, and account <br />for more than 70% of the variance in the gauge records. <br />On the basis of the extensive sensitivity analyses, differ- <br />ences in predictor pools and data reduction methods had <br />little significant impact on important features (e.g., long- <br />term mean, runs of drought years, etc.) of the reconstruc- <br />tions. The use of standard versus prewhitened chronologies <br />does have some impact on the magnitude of reconstructed <br />high and low flows, and the standard chronology models <br />retain a degree of low-order autocorrelation similar to that <br />in the gauge record. <br />[4S] The Lees Ferry reconstructions presented here differ <br />from the efforts of Stockton and Jacoby [1976] and Hidalgo <br />et at. [2000] in suggesting a higher long-term mean for <br />Upper Colorado River flows, and to some degree, less <br />extreme multiyear droughts. While the choice of predictor <br />pools and calibration data sets may factor into these differ- <br />ences, statistical reconstruction methodology, particularly <br />the treatment of autocorrelation, also contributes to reduced <br />drought magnitude and an increased long-term mean. <br />[46] Spatially, the relationships between reconstructed <br />subbasin flows are similar to those in the gauge records, <br />except for the San Juan reconstruction, which is somewhat <br />more highly correlated with the other gauge reconstructions <br />over the instrumental period. This enhanced similarity is <br />lessened over the full reconstruction period. lt is possible <br />that the higher correlation between the San Juan and other <br />basins is due to the lack of tree ring chronologies actually <br />located in the San Juan River basin. However, exploratory <br />analyses using several recently generated tree ring chronol- <br />ogies in the San Juan basin did not change these results <br />(C. Woodhouse, unpublished). The reconstructions also <br />capture the contribution of subbasin flows to total Colorado <br />River flow at Lees Ferry. The subbasin flows together <br />account for about 96% of upper Colorado River flow and <br />contributions from the three basins are relatively stable over <br />the 43 I-year common period. <br />[47] As seen in the comparisons of the Lees Ferry and <br />subbasin reconstructions, over the past four centuries severe <br />multiyear and decadal-scale droughts in the upper Colorado <br />River basin have tended to be widespread events. The most <br />severe 5-, 10- and 20-year droughts recorded at Lees Ferry <br />are always reflected in the subbasin gauges, although there <br />are subregional differences in the magnitude of droughts. <br />When the influence of subbasin conditions on Lees Ferry <br />flow is examined, most periods of low flow in one subbasin <br />coincide with low flows in the other subbasins. There are <br />some exceptions, in particular when flow in the Green River <br />is low and the San Juan flow is high. In most of these <br />periods of contrasting drought conditions, Lees Ferry flows <br />are average, but a few cases (e.g., the 1930s) suggest that <br />drought in the Green River can have an overriding influence <br />on flows at Lees Ferry, even when high flows prevail on the <br />San Juan. Likewise multidecadal flow regimes tend to be <br />strongly coherent across the basin. <br />[48] Again, the magnitude of these persistent high and <br />low-flow events varies across the basin, but the timing <br />and duration of these regimes is consistent among the <br />reconstructions. <br /> <br />6.2. Upper Colorado River Droughts and Possible <br />Climatic Drivers <br />[49] The coherency of many single and multiyear <br />droughts across the reconstructions points to common <br />drivers for high-frequency variations in regional hydro- <br />climate. Spectral analysis of the Lees Ferry reconstruction <br />(Figure 6) shows significant variability in a three to seven <br />year band associated with the El Nino Southern Oscillation <br />(EN SO) [Cayan et al., 1999]. Similar high-frequency peaks <br />exist in the subbasin reconstructions. Examination of <br />gauged values and ENSO indicates a good correspondence <br />between La Nina events and low flows on the San Juan, but <br />the relationship is less clear in the other gauges. This agrees <br />with Cayan and Webb [1992] who found that streamflow in <br />the southwestern part of Colorado typically shares the <br />strong southwestern United States response to ENSO (i.e., <br />increased winter precipitation during El Nino events), while <br />the response is much weaker at gauges north of this region, <br />and Hidalgo and Dracup [2003] who reported the ENSO <br />response is much weaker in the Colorado Headwaters and <br />Upper Green River areas. <br />[so] Coherency between flows at multidecadal and longer <br />timescales also suggests that remote forcing or region-wide <br />circulation features influence lower-frequency variations in <br />the Upper Colorado River. Although statistical associations <br />have been demonstrated between North American drought <br />and North Atlantic [Enfield et ai., 2001], North Pacific <br />[Cayan et at., 1998; McCabe et al., 2004] and Indian Ocean <br />[Hoerling and Kumar, 2003] variability, more research is <br />needed to understand how slow changes in sea surface <br />temperatures are tied to Upper Colorado River flow <br />regimes. <br />[SI] Overall, intrabasin variations in reconstructed <br />drought magnitude, combined with spectral analyses sug- <br />gesting variability over a broad range of timescales (i~ter- <br />annual to multidecadal), indicate complex and pOSSIbly <br />nonstationary linkages between the Upper Colorado River <br />and regional to remote forcings. Independent proxy data for <br />ocean variability (i.e., not from western North American <br />tree rings) and modeling studies are needed to better <br />examine the long-term relationships between Colorado <br />River flows and potential climatic drivers. <br /> <br />6.3. Implications for Management <br />[52] The recent drought has been a wake-up call for m~ny <br />water management agencies throughout the Colorado RIver <br />basin. This drought (2000-2004), as measured by 5-year <br />running means of water year total flow at Lees Ferry, is a <br />markedly severe event in the context of the tree ring <br />reconstruction extending to 1490, and the probability is <br />low (p < 0.10) that any S-year period since 1850 has been as <br />dry. However, the current drought is not without precedence <br />in the tree ring record. Average reconstructed annual flow <br />for the period 1844-1848 was lower than the observed flow <br />for 1999-2004. In view of reconstruction error, it is helpful <br />to evaluate tree ring reconstructions probabilistically, and <br />such an evaluation suggests that eight periods between IS36 <br />and 1850 had at least a 10% probability of being as dry as <br />1999- 2004. In addition, longer duration droughts have <br />occurred in the past. The Lees Ferry reconstruction contains <br />one sequence each of six, eight, and eleven consecutive <br />years with t10ws below the 1906-1995 average (1663- <br /> <br />.. <br /> <br />14 of 16 <br />