|
<br />W05415
<br />
<br />WOODHOUSE ET AL.: UPDATED COLORADO RIVER RECONSTRUCTIONS
<br />
<br />W05415
<br />
<br />Bluff; and the full Upper Colorado River at Lees Ferry
<br />(available online at http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/paleo/pubs/
<br />woodhouse2006/woodhouse2006.html). These reconstruc-
<br />tions span the common years IS69 to 1997, and account
<br />for more than 70% of the variance in the gauge records.
<br />On the basis of the extensive sensitivity analyses, differ-
<br />ences in predictor pools and data reduction methods had
<br />little significant impact on important features (e.g., long-
<br />term mean, runs of drought years, etc.) of the reconstruc-
<br />tions. The use of standard versus prewhitened chronologies
<br />does have some impact on the magnitude of reconstructed
<br />high and low flows, and the standard chronology models
<br />retain a degree of low-order autocorrelation similar to that
<br />in the gauge record.
<br />[4S] The Lees Ferry reconstructions presented here differ
<br />from the efforts of Stockton and Jacoby [1976] and Hidalgo
<br />et at. [2000] in suggesting a higher long-term mean for
<br />Upper Colorado River flows, and to some degree, less
<br />extreme multiyear droughts. While the choice of predictor
<br />pools and calibration data sets may factor into these differ-
<br />ences, statistical reconstruction methodology, particularly
<br />the treatment of autocorrelation, also contributes to reduced
<br />drought magnitude and an increased long-term mean.
<br />[46] Spatially, the relationships between reconstructed
<br />subbasin flows are similar to those in the gauge records,
<br />except for the San Juan reconstruction, which is somewhat
<br />more highly correlated with the other gauge reconstructions
<br />over the instrumental period. This enhanced similarity is
<br />lessened over the full reconstruction period. lt is possible
<br />that the higher correlation between the San Juan and other
<br />basins is due to the lack of tree ring chronologies actually
<br />located in the San Juan River basin. However, exploratory
<br />analyses using several recently generated tree ring chronol-
<br />ogies in the San Juan basin did not change these results
<br />(C. Woodhouse, unpublished). The reconstructions also
<br />capture the contribution of subbasin flows to total Colorado
<br />River flow at Lees Ferry. The subbasin flows together
<br />account for about 96% of upper Colorado River flow and
<br />contributions from the three basins are relatively stable over
<br />the 43 I-year common period.
<br />[47] As seen in the comparisons of the Lees Ferry and
<br />subbasin reconstructions, over the past four centuries severe
<br />multiyear and decadal-scale droughts in the upper Colorado
<br />River basin have tended to be widespread events. The most
<br />severe 5-, 10- and 20-year droughts recorded at Lees Ferry
<br />are always reflected in the subbasin gauges, although there
<br />are subregional differences in the magnitude of droughts.
<br />When the influence of subbasin conditions on Lees Ferry
<br />flow is examined, most periods of low flow in one subbasin
<br />coincide with low flows in the other subbasins. There are
<br />some exceptions, in particular when flow in the Green River
<br />is low and the San Juan flow is high. In most of these
<br />periods of contrasting drought conditions, Lees Ferry flows
<br />are average, but a few cases (e.g., the 1930s) suggest that
<br />drought in the Green River can have an overriding influence
<br />on flows at Lees Ferry, even when high flows prevail on the
<br />San Juan. Likewise multidecadal flow regimes tend to be
<br />strongly coherent across the basin.
<br />[48] Again, the magnitude of these persistent high and
<br />low-flow events varies across the basin, but the timing
<br />and duration of these regimes is consistent among the
<br />reconstructions.
<br />
<br />6.2. Upper Colorado River Droughts and Possible
<br />Climatic Drivers
<br />[49] The coherency of many single and multiyear
<br />droughts across the reconstructions points to common
<br />drivers for high-frequency variations in regional hydro-
<br />climate. Spectral analysis of the Lees Ferry reconstruction
<br />(Figure 6) shows significant variability in a three to seven
<br />year band associated with the El Nino Southern Oscillation
<br />(EN SO) [Cayan et al., 1999]. Similar high-frequency peaks
<br />exist in the subbasin reconstructions. Examination of
<br />gauged values and ENSO indicates a good correspondence
<br />between La Nina events and low flows on the San Juan, but
<br />the relationship is less clear in the other gauges. This agrees
<br />with Cayan and Webb [1992] who found that streamflow in
<br />the southwestern part of Colorado typically shares the
<br />strong southwestern United States response to ENSO (i.e.,
<br />increased winter precipitation during El Nino events), while
<br />the response is much weaker at gauges north of this region,
<br />and Hidalgo and Dracup [2003] who reported the ENSO
<br />response is much weaker in the Colorado Headwaters and
<br />Upper Green River areas.
<br />[so] Coherency between flows at multidecadal and longer
<br />timescales also suggests that remote forcing or region-wide
<br />circulation features influence lower-frequency variations in
<br />the Upper Colorado River. Although statistical associations
<br />have been demonstrated between North American drought
<br />and North Atlantic [Enfield et ai., 2001], North Pacific
<br />[Cayan et at., 1998; McCabe et al., 2004] and Indian Ocean
<br />[Hoerling and Kumar, 2003] variability, more research is
<br />needed to understand how slow changes in sea surface
<br />temperatures are tied to Upper Colorado River flow
<br />regimes.
<br />[SI] Overall, intrabasin variations in reconstructed
<br />drought magnitude, combined with spectral analyses sug-
<br />gesting variability over a broad range of timescales (i~ter-
<br />annual to multidecadal), indicate complex and pOSSIbly
<br />nonstationary linkages between the Upper Colorado River
<br />and regional to remote forcings. Independent proxy data for
<br />ocean variability (i.e., not from western North American
<br />tree rings) and modeling studies are needed to better
<br />examine the long-term relationships between Colorado
<br />River flows and potential climatic drivers.
<br />
<br />6.3. Implications for Management
<br />[52] The recent drought has been a wake-up call for m~ny
<br />water management agencies throughout the Colorado RIver
<br />basin. This drought (2000-2004), as measured by 5-year
<br />running means of water year total flow at Lees Ferry, is a
<br />markedly severe event in the context of the tree ring
<br />reconstruction extending to 1490, and the probability is
<br />low (p < 0.10) that any S-year period since 1850 has been as
<br />dry. However, the current drought is not without precedence
<br />in the tree ring record. Average reconstructed annual flow
<br />for the period 1844-1848 was lower than the observed flow
<br />for 1999-2004. In view of reconstruction error, it is helpful
<br />to evaluate tree ring reconstructions probabilistically, and
<br />such an evaluation suggests that eight periods between IS36
<br />and 1850 had at least a 10% probability of being as dry as
<br />1999- 2004. In addition, longer duration droughts have
<br />occurred in the past. The Lees Ferry reconstruction contains
<br />one sequence each of six, eight, and eleven consecutive
<br />years with t10ws below the 1906-1995 average (1663-
<br />
<br />..
<br />
<br />14 of 16
<br />
|