Laserfiche WebLink
<br />W05415 <br /> <br />WOODHOUSE ET AL.: UPDATED COLORADO RIVER RECONSTRUCTIONS <br /> <br />W05415 <br /> <br /> <br />~ <br />0 75 <br />u:: <br /> ----------~---~------ <br /> 50 Lowest bserv <br /> 1500 1550 1600 1650 1700 1750 1800 1850 1900 1950 2000 <br /> Ending Year of 5-yr Running Mean <br />OJ <br />E <br />0 <br />c: <br />'15 <br />~ <br />!!...- <br />~ <br />0 <br />u:: <br /> - - - - - - - - - - - - - ~ ~ - - -- - - <br /> 50 owest 0 serve <br /> 1500 1550 1600 1650 1700 1750 1800 1850 1900 1950 2000 <br /> Ending Year of 5-yr Running Mean <br /> 150 <br />~ <br />OJ <br />E 125 <br />0 <br />c: <br />~ <br />0 75 <br />u:: <br /> 50 <br /> 1500 1900 1950 2000 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Figure 11. Current drought in long-term context from reconstructed 5-year running means of natural <br />flow at Lees Ferry, Arizona. (a) Observed and reconstructed flow. (b) Observed flow and flow with 0.25 <br />nonexceedance probability derived from reconstruction and its estimated error variance. (c) Observed <br />flow and reconstructed flow with 0.10 nonexceedance probability. Flow is plotted as percentage of <br />1906-1995 mean of observed mean annual flow, or 18,788 million cubic meters (15.232 MAF). <br />Reconstruction series is from model Lees-A (see text). <br /> <br />The standard error of a 5-year mean was estimated as Sm = <br />RMSEcv/V5, where RMSEcv is the cross-validation root- <br />mean-square error of the annual reconstructed values. The <br />computed standard error and the assumption that the errors <br />are normally distributed yield confidence intervals and <br />threshold levels of reconstructed 5-year mean flow with <br />specific empirical nonexceedance probabilities. <br />[42] The reconstructed (Lees-A) 5-year means for Lees <br />Ferry along with the threshold levels of flow with 0.2S and <br />0.10 nonexceedance probability are plotted in Figure 11 <br />with the observed 1999-2004 mean as a baseline ("Lowest <br />Observed") for comparison. The S-year mean for 1999- <br />2004 was 12,187 MCM, or 64.9% of the 1906-1995 <br />mean natural flow. The time series plots indicate that only <br />one S-year period, 1844-1848, was drier than 1999-2004 <br />(Figure 1Ia). Annual reconstructed flow during this period <br />averaged 63% of normal. <br />[43] A probabilistic interpretation of the reconstruction <br />indicates, however, that several other periods have a rea- <br />sonably large probability of being drier than 1999-2004. <br /> <br />Two additional periods, in the early IS00s and early 1600s, <br />have a 25% or greater chance of being as dry as 1999-2004 <br />(Figure 11 b). Six periods in addition to the 1840s have a <br />10% or greater chance of being drier than 1999 - 2004 <br />(Figure 11 c). During the signature drought of 1844-1848, <br />the probability is 10% that the true 5-year mean flow was as <br />low as 54.8% of normal (10,290 MCM or 8.3422 MAF). It <br />should be emphasized that Lees-A is the most conservative <br />(wettest) of our Lees Ferry reconstructions, and that other <br />versions give even more frequent past occurrences of flow <br />lower than in 1999-2004. <br /> <br />6. Discussion and Conclusions <br /> <br />6.1. Updated Reconstructions <br /> <br />[44] An updated and expanded set of tree ring chronol- <br />ogies has enabled the generation of high-quality water year <br />streamflow reconstructions for four key gauges in the <br />Upper Colorado River basin; the Green River at Green <br />River, UT; Colorado River near Cisco; San Juan near <br /> <br />13 of 16 <br />