My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9646
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Copyright
>
9646
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:01:48 PM
Creation date
5/20/2009 1:40:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9646
Author
Wiley, R. W. and R. S. Wydoski.
Title
Management of Undesirable Fish Species.
USFW Year
1993.
USFW - Doc Type
335-354
Copyright Material
YES
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />336 CHAPTER 14 <br /> <br />Box 14.1 Criteria to Determine if Fish are Undesirable <br /> <br />I. The species does not contribute to the sport fishery (may not be <br />available or acceptable to anglers or commercial fishers) or forage base. <br />2. The species inhibits development or maintenance of desirable fish <br />through predation or direct competition with sport or commercial <br />fishes. <br />3. The species is detrimental to the biological balance of the aquatic <br />system (e.g., large gizzard shad sometimes constitute most of the <br />biomass in reservoirs). <br />4. The species may serve as a potential reservoir for pathogenic organ- <br />isms in a hatchery water supply. <br />5. The species may interfere with other wildlife management practices <br />(e.g., common carp cause turbidity inhibiting the growth of aquatic <br />plants that are used as food by waterfowl). <br /> <br />weeds and gardeners (Box 14.\). Early fisheries administrators in the United <br />States (e.g., Spencer F. Baird) were instrumental in the introduction of common <br />carp into North America because it was considered to be a good food fish. Within <br />20 years (1877-1896) after its introduction, the common carp was disdained <br />because it failed to provide sport for anglers and was not used for food (Cumming <br />1975). In addition to control of nongame species, stunted stocks of game fish are <br />sometimes controlled because they are not of a size that is acceptable to anglers. <br /> <br />14.2.1 Families of Fish Targeted for Control <br /> <br />Control programs have targeted virtually all species of freshwater fishes <br />(Lennon et al. 1970; Dunst et al. 1974). Most (54%) of the current control efforts <br />are directed at three families of fishes: herrings (primarily gizzard shad), minnows <br />(almost exclusively common carp), and sunfish (Table 14.\). An additional 22% of <br />the control efforts involved suckers (11%) and bullhead catfishes (11%). Although <br />the need was recognized as early as 1900, conservation agencies did not routinely <br />implement control measures until after 1930 (Figure 14.\). <br />The management of undesirable fish species in North America appears to be <br />evolving from control of a single species toward an approach that considers <br />relationships with companion species of fish. Modified stocking practices, <br />changes in regulations, and development of strains of stocked fish are being used <br />as strategies to manage undesirable species. <br /> <br />14.3 F ACILIT A TING MANAGEMENT OF UNDESIRABLE <br />FISH STOCKS <br /> <br />Three methods are used to control undesirable stocks of fish: chemical, <br />biological, and mechanical. Chemical and biological means are favored over <br />mechanical controls for most families of fishes (Table 14.1). Chemica I control of <br />fish stocks is summarized in Johnson and Finley (1980) and Schnick et al. (1986). <br />Biological control of fish stocks appears to be increasing, perhaps as a result of <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.