My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9646
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Copyright
>
9646
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:01:48 PM
Creation date
5/20/2009 1:40:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9646
Author
Wiley, R. W. and R. S. Wydoski.
Title
Management of Undesirable Fish Species.
USFW Year
1993.
USFW - Doc Type
335-354
Copyright Material
YES
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />UNDESIRABLE SPECIES <br /> <br />347 <br /> <br />14.5.2 Controlling Reproduction <br /> <br />Other biological controls include stocking hybrids that have little or no potential <br />to reproduce or altering the sex of fish by chemicals and heat to produce fish that <br />will never develop sexually or that will produce monosex individuals. Natural <br />reproduction of introduced fish species is sometimes considered undesirable. In <br />such cases, controlling reproduction by genetic manipulation is sometimes <br />warranted. In farm ponds, hybrid sunfish (limited reproductive capability) can be <br />established by two methods: (I) stocking FI hybrid sunfish directly into the ponds, <br />or (2) stocking parental fish of the correct sex to produce the desired hybrids <br />(Kurzawski and Heidinger 1982). In such situations, largemouth bass can control <br />any F2 hybrid sunfish since recruitment of F2 hybrids are minimal (Brunson and <br />Robinette 1986). <br /> <br />14.5.3 Forage Fish <br /> <br />Prey introductions are sometimes made in efforts to increase the growth of <br />stunted predators that are too small to be acceptable to anglers. However. <br />problems have also been caused by well-intentioned decisions to improve the <br />forage base for game fish. A classical example is the competitive interaction that <br />resulted from the introduction of redside shiners as possible forage for rainbow <br />trout in British Columbia lakes (Johannes and Larkin 1961). The introduction <br />failed because the behavior of the shiners resulted in ecological separation from <br />trout large enough to be effective predators while the shiners competed directly <br />for food with small trout. <br />Fish that are considered undesirable in some locations may serve as acceptable <br />forage in others. For example, Tui chubs provide the primary forage for a rainbow <br />trout subspecies in Eagle Lake, California (Burns 1966). In Pyramid Lake, <br />Nevada, Lahontan cutthroat trout prey upon Tui chub and the chub is not a <br />problem there. However, in other waters of the intermountain and western states, <br />minnows such as the Tui chub and Utah chub compete with stocked fingerling <br />rainbow trout. Consequently, they are controlled by stocking strains of trout that <br />are piscivorous, stocking warm or cool water predators, or through chemical <br />rehabilitation. <br />Some prey species are used more by predator species than others. For example, <br />rainbow smelt are considered to be better forage organisms for landlocked <br />Atlantic salmon in New England than alewife because of being more spatially <br />available. In some cases, the introduction of a prey species to serve as forage for <br />one game fish may result in competition with another. For example, cisco stocked <br />as prey for lake trout in Lake Opeongo, Ontario, competed with young small- <br />mouth bass (Emery 1975). Therefore, the biology of the species to be introduced <br />should be carefully reviewed. An ideal forage organism should be prolific, stable <br />in abundance, trophically efficient, vulnerable to predators, nonemigrating, and <br />innocuous to other species (Ney 1981). <br /> <br />14.5.4 Underexploited Fishes <br /> <br />Some conservation agencies have initiated programs to encourage the use of <br />less desirable fishes for food and sport. The common carp is one of the most <br />important problem fish species in North America because it is very prolific and <br />sought by few anglers. Miller (1972) offered suggestions on how to fish for <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.