Laserfiche WebLink
<br />- 05/Q7/96 13:48 <br /> <br />"C2S15383 <br /> <br />steering comffli<<Cc lUld Oft hydroJoB)" and bi- <br />ology subcommlnccs_ Mttr 1I. tumultuous be. <br />ginning, the: steer-Ing committee g1O\lp', <br />compri~ of mch diVCd~ ttulties IS the Col. <br />orado Water Congrcas and the National Audu. <br />boo Society. llre oow working together. <br />Moreover, M:lte ad fedenJ agencies are pn:s. <br />("otly coopedung by sharing in (1;11: analysis of <br />~. <br />After there was general a~eat by the <br />tecl'1niciilJls em the habiw needs ot the ftsh, a <br />subconunlttcc: representing aU im:en:_ aroups <br />~ted I. recovety implementation plan. 1be <br />plan requires a cooperative fcdcml.state-prlvate <br />etton and iQclu4ef. ~ to I.CquiN In- <br />stream tlOWl for the flab pursuant to ~te Isw. <br />The plan further cub COr a cbaoge In operation <br />of ul\ daJna tl) bent:tit the fisb. NonnOW' pro. <br />grams, 5Uch as stocking native fish. contn)lIins <br />st~ltini of $poct fish. :Ind habitat development, <br />are also lmpomlm elements or dll: proparal. 1be <br />programs ate dnigned to Qf&ct dtpJetion Jill- <br />pacts of water proJcc:tl :aad allow du: 'FW$ to <br />issue nonjeoparoy biOlogical optnlODl_ <br />ODe proof that the process Is worIdng is <br />tba.t developmem and copservation inteteSrs <br />h:tv~ &inee requested the formatloa oCa similar <br />group for the Platte River. The FWS and ebe &Jt <br />had been working $i1KC: 1983 to avoid :II Jeop. <br />ardy opinion for the Narrows Prolect on the <br />South Plane River. The aa~~ had Invited <br /> <br />rends <br /> <br />COfttlnllMl fro". /KIP 46 <br /> <br />;limed dcLIiog 'With complete fallun: of pro- <br />duction:l.ll resulr of physical problems wilh <br />tbe well or mental inttn'C1.\tion. Closely <br />I"Cld---llnd ~ CIl rtainJy coum Oft them beiOS <br />closely read by Ic;uon; ~ couns-rhey may <br />noc maintain 1caK5 In the railing pdc;cs. <br />The opcrulOn3 clause In an OJ <br />makes opcratil)n$ fOt dtilJing or well <br />the cquiv:alc:nt of production in payiu. Q. <br />dth~$. WhUe the COWlS arc: generally vtty liberal <br />in d~fining wIw consdtur.es "opendODS, "-If'P. <br />for ~xamp". Alf,M Oil, 1~. v. Miller, 11 lCut. <br />App.2d 152,71' P.2d U9S (KlID.App.1986) <br />holding that prepannory opel'ations ro.. drllliJt8 <br />II sindt well conscltutcd "operations," though <br />the drill bit did not KtualJy begin 1'0 mm and. <br />no actiyjty took pl:ace on the leased pt'Opcny~ <br />few produccrs are likely to opt to drill eddi. <br />liooal wrII$ or t~work existing wrII8 'W'~n tbey <br />annor sell their produaion profitably. <br /> <br /> <br />ROCKY MTN. SOL <br /> <br />Colorado. WyomJng, and Nebraska to partid. <br />pille. The 5talCli were llninteteSttd until the nvs <br />bi ) 984 proptl8C<l tQ indude on tlu: threatened <br />and cndaDaered IIsl twO new bitd 5pcd~ which <br />use PI~ Rivrr habitat_ <br />')be 1985 ESA rtalJrhOrlWion htarin&li are <br />anOlhcr Indication lbat the UCRBCC prO((ss is <br />wotkiftS. In t~ put, dewlOpIf\eDt imerests lob- <br />bied against the FWS's handling of C0D5ultati4;m$ <br />;lIId pI'OpOHd aJUcnclluents to limit FWS au- <br />tJLodty under tbe I!SA. But, by 1985, te6timo~y <br />by dntt'lopmt:nt interestS _ hiJhly supportive <br />of the fWS's c:urrem approach. ConservatiOft <br />group$ ~rc t;ritial, tIowever, of the Windy <br />G2p pIOCeN. <br />SiAce no single intc["est sroup iu the <br />UCRBCC balds the balaatt of pqwtr, aU "Wllnt <br />a:hc contllct resolved, The lawyers for thc in- <br />'9o(~d Stoups bave been co~ntrating on how <br />ro accomplish rhc program cooperatively rlltM:r <br />dWl taking a diviJiln; iippr'Oja(;h. for example. <br />in a rcc:cnt braillStDl'lDiog IC:.HIoa of tbc Wa~ <br />r..w S<<tiOft of the Colorado Bill' Associlltioo the <br />lawyenl discu81100 aJu:madve approaches unde[' <br />COJondo l;tw to p~1;t water n;I(:aKd. fl'Qm a <br />D'R dam 10 thu the flows would rach the: tlsl1 <br />babitll(. <br />With imagJMl:ion and continued coopel'll- <br />don, lOlutlons caa be fouod tblt will protect <br />C1Klan8~d s,ptdtls while providing addJtiOftal <br />water dew:lopmenr for western states. ~ <br /> <br />Likcwile. while a c~tiOl:l of ptodUctiOD <br /><:Ia1isc -,v;U c:a:t<:nd the k2se after production <br />CCUCll. IUCh clauses generally are drafted to J:e- <br />quUoe lIdditiooel drillio8 Of ~worklng open- <br />tiODlI within sixty or ninety da}l5. It 15 ualJkc;1y <br />d1U a prodUCCT who . ~ng IIIQDq from op- <br />etations will spend IIlOI'C drilling :additional <br />well. or reworking ex~lin8 -wellS. F\u'IMl"D\OU. <br />rbefe ate t;a5el5 that SOIY that tilt: gn.ce period of <br />E csntJoD of pmdualon clause begiJl$ to run <br />at du!i . r Iny month in which 1C2IC oJlCl'a. <br />lioaalreoo .table. Sfi.foruample. m1lc:h <br />p. 7P.llftn Oil S7 Okla. D.AJ. nos (May <br />20, 1986). UDder Ib rcrprctltlon the grace <br />period 1MY bI~ roo be the oil company <br />tftIizn dIIt the lease Ii unpro Ic. <br />Many in the; ifJd\lttty n&y assu that the <br />fall of 011 plces J&:an ~J'l.t beyond thei <br />thlt will triJFr W saviD&S proVisions <br />~. rlU6jtnlrtI clawe. J1orc. majeurt/ cia <br /> <br /> <br />IiII 0041004 <br /> <br />71 <br />