Laserfiche WebLink
<br />,06/07/96 13:48 <br /> <br />'&2318383 <br /> <br />ROCKY IITN. SOL <br /> <br />~003/004 <br /> <br />.. <br /> <br />It <br /> <br /> <br />Agreement 111'111 have on the implcmeou- <br />d<<i5iOn is allio ~n. <br /> <br />olutio1U to the <br />Quality, antity Conflict <br /> <br />'W'hatcw:r the: ultima <br />Delta Mter cases, the illucw <br />Art' p~nl thtouahoot 1M ~m <br />Stat~. r. 'W\Irer qualiry more 81gniftcalll <br />beneficial consumpuve use? Are ~ WlIIter <br />rlghu to be IImiled and qualified _ necessary <br />to maintain "without project" quality of river <br />~r:ms? $o1Tl(: oomparibility bl;twQ;n wa~r <br />qualIty and wuc:r qiwldty Is caaJaly ID order, <br />but tb limit drpletiM so &r M ~ to <br />mahullin ptt-project condirloM may -well lnd <br />to impairment of JDOS( watCJ' rights. <br />SolUtions to the water quality /wacet quan- <br />tity C(JnfIict ClIO be (QUnd within the ~k <br />of the prioriry system. Pot Jnsr.~e, tile SWRCB <br />could have utUizN the Jaw of prior appropri- <br />arion IS a mechan1&m for ensurill8 hJgb-qulUty <br />water for Delta lIliCI'8. Since moat of the CVP <br />pcrmttl wen; ~ pnor to tilt tim(: till; SWP <br />pcl'mltS wcn: bsued, me fundamearal burden <br />for m<<tina ~ltz 'ftttr qUlllity sUU\dard$ should <br /> <br />bavc rested UPOD SWP, tbe junior.approprlalo:. <br />In fact, tbe SWP authOri~On contemplated that <br />w SWP would be opented to 1IH!~ Ot:lta water <br />quality lMJIDdards, IIld the stare bat ncvel' arsucd <br />Othenvise. Thl.s priority ~m 501utiOll. was i8- <br />~d by the SWRC8 and the California couns, <br />hQwcvcr, u it may 1;w; ignc;u-t:d in water quaHty <br />regulation aaivides throusbout the n:glon, <br />~ir~r on the basis tIw; t~ ptiJ\&p1~ ot the <br />priority sysu:m were not considered by tbe rei. <br />l')' audlor_tr or duu Ihey were purposely <br />d to .recluce the Imf4Cl of wattr quality <br />- on one particular ua:r. <br />Ano r avl:lll,le foe solution of the walei' <br />qualitylM r qumdty contlict on IUCarn .,.. <br />temS, tom iblc with th~ I"cc:.-osnitil)n of vl;$b:d. <br />wattl' rightS, woulCl be 10 let w:u:u quality. <br />standards for. t Dc-lm area al the hIghcsr level <br />by IImltln, funhc lecioM by new appro- <br />priations_ To the ut~ a level is inade- <br />quue ro serve the pubIk in w:u:er supplies <br />am always be augmented by acqu tI.OD of rlyel' <br />Rows for dilution of poIluraDts A4d tc~IIiQ& of <br />.It intrusions by purchase or coodeJriJlation, <br />with C(mlp~ti(lrt to tk VC$tcd ri~ owner <br />fDr' Ios6 of private rights in pUfmlt of I public: <br />~t~~. ~ <br /> <br /> <br />ESA Consultations <br /> <br />to consider c:hanp JII. bocb water quality and <br />(l'umlify. The CoqI& WIi nut to war bliJldel'5 <br />and mult look at the downRrnm deplerl.vr cf. <br />ftta; of the opttation of dams. The coun swed <br />that ~D. if the Corps bad Jmptited me SIa~'S <br />aUthoriry EO allocMe waa:t. an iaue on which <br />the COUJ't decLtlled to rule, tbe Cofps had 0Iaed <br />within Its luthorlty. The coun explain" that <br />althQu;h l\iI;c;tion 101(1) WlI$ a ~neral policy <br />SCltement which couJd not oolIlfy substantive <br />audlorlty, k WU5 an IndklltlOll that CoJlllCi5 )0. <br />tended mat tMtt: bt: M ~ uU~rk~ with <br />SUite wacer management man DeceInJ'f. Jttwr. <br />side Jrrlg_tion lJUtrl(;t v. AJ'ldrftJ.S. 7S8 f.2d <br />JOB (10th Cu. 1985). <br /> <br />70 <br /> <br />T~ 11f.tuotl Come Togdher <br /> <br />One year beforr llbNJNlM 'W:I8 da'=1dM, ar. <br />commodation became the new pmc plaD CuI" <br />the ESA/CoIorado River probJ~.... The aid. <br />dsm and luror raised by the DR and deYclop- <br />mcnt tn~ over ln5l:~am fl<nvs propoeed by <br /> <br />ConN"ueII from pdge 4&.- <br /> <br />the dnJ\ conservation plan lot Colorado Rivcc <br />~naertd fi$h reSulted in the: fWS wilbdraw- <br />Ing rM plan in February 1984. ConfUCtI be- <br /> <br />"",een the flsb's habitat needs and local wat~r <br />ngbC;$, CQuph::d wid) a 1982 EM ameDdmeru to <br />~Ive tbese Issue.$ wlth state and local lieD- <br />clcs, led to a new approach. Finally, realizlog <br />that thr ~ue; ~.::eded tQ be:: wIved. in coope:. <br />arlon with the BR, the starell. the wau:r dcvcl. <br />opctS, and the conservation ~Dlzatlol15, the <br />FWS invired IWO ~gional dittttOd of the BR. <br />and l'epre$Cl1t2tiVf;$ flom Colorado. Ut2h, and <br />WyominS to a Much 1984 meellng. lbe meel- <br />IDg resulted in six cnuue.i formiDg die Upper <br />Colondo Riftt Blasia Coocdioatina Committee <br />(UCRBCC). <br />By Aupr 1984, the: uact)CC ~gRed to de- <br />velop aDd implement a JK'O,vam of reasonable <br />81\d ptu~nt &ltttnlldves which wc;re intcqdcd <br />to allow development without Jeopardizing the <br />endangered t1sh and to Icknowlc:dgc and con. <br />sid~ state WIUb' righl5 and the Colol'lldQ 'tUver <br />compactS. The UCRBCC IDvited development <br />and t;Onservatloll groups to partiCipate 04 a <br />