Laserfiche WebLink
<br />242 <br /> <br />D. F. Woodward fl ul <br /> <br />Table 1. Concentration (mg/L) of different classes of organic compounds in the water-soluble fraction (WSF) of five shale oil product, <br />------ <br /> <br /> Shale oil products <br /> -. <br /> Crude <br /> Upgraded Refined <br />Compound Geokinetics Tosco Paraho Paraho HDT Paraho JI', <br /> -. <br />Aliphatic, cycloaliphatic, and olefinic hydrocarbons <br /> 5.2 0.33 1.6 18.5 14.5 <br />Aromatic and polar compounds <br />Monoaromatic 3,7 2.9 0.38 8,8 8,5 <br />Diaromatic 0.98 0,30 0.08 0.05 0.66 <br />3-Ring aromatic 0.02 <0.01 <0.01 0.07 <0,01 <br />Aliphatic ketones <0.003 0.74 <0.003 <0.003 <O,OO~ <br />Phenols 4,6 2.0 1.9 <0.002 <0,002 <br />Pyridines 2.8 1.8 1.0 <0.002 <0.002 <br />Indoles 0.92 0.42 0,32 <0.003 <O,O<B <br />Quinolines <0.002 0.32 <0.002 <0.002 <0,002 <br />Alkyl thiophenes 0.06 0.35 0.19 <0.001 <0.001 <br />Total 18,3 9.2 5.5 27,4 23,7 <br /> <br />Table 2. Toxicity of the water-soluble fraction of five shale oils <br />to Colorado squawfish (CS), fathead minnows (FM), and cut- <br />throat trout (CT) <br /> <br /> Mean size LC50 (mg/L total oil)" <br />Oil and exposure time (hr) <br />fish Length Weight <br />species (mm) (g) 48 96 <br />Geokinetics <br />CS 120 12 4.5 (3.9-5.2), 4.5 (3,9-5.2) <br />FM 30 0.24 2,9 (2.6-3.6) 2,9 (2,6-3.6) <br />CT 51 1.1 1.8 (1.6-2.0) 1.8 (1.6-2.0) <br />Tosco <br />CS 77 3,1 >3.7 2.3 (2.0-2,7) <br />FM 30 0.21 3.0 (2.6-3.4) 2,3 (2,1-2.5) <br />CT 46 0.83 4.4 (3.7-5.2) 2.1 (1.7-2.4) <br />Paraho <br />CS 72 2.3 4.2 (3.5-5,0) 4.2 (3.5-5.0) <br />FM 30 0.19 3.5 (3.2-3.8) >1.7<3.3 <br />CT 55 1.5 1.7 (1.4-2,1) 1.3 (1.0-1.6) <br />Paraho HDT <br />CS 87 4.4 >2.4 >2.4 <br />FM 37 0,39 >2.4 >2.4 <br />CT 41 0.88 >5.0 >5.0 <br />Paraho IP-4 <br />CS 84 3.7 >2.] >2.1 <br />FM 29 0.23 >2.1 >2.] <br />CT 6] 1.9 >1.5 >].5 <br /> <br />" Values expressed as total oil concentration lethal to 50% of the <br />test organisms (LC50); 95% confidence interval in parentheses. <br />Test temperatures were 200C for CS and FM and \OoC for CT <br /> <br />crude shale oils enabled us to measure 96-hr LC50s <br />(Table 2). No mortality was observed in any of the <br />high exposure solutions for Paraho HDT and <br />Paraho JP-4. Comparisons of LC50s at 96 hr indi- <br />cated that Colorado squawfish were slightly more <br />tolerant than fathead minnows and cutthroat trout <br />to the crude shale oils. <br /> <br />t" <br /> <br />Sublethal effects were observed at concentr" <br />tions of one-half to one-eighth of those causin~ <br />acute toxicity (Table 3). Predator success was lh. <br />most sensitive sublethal response measured. Swin' <br />ming performance and prey success were reduc(,' <br />significantly (P ~ 0.05) in the highest concentralil\: <br />tested for Geokinetics, Tosco, and Paraho. :\, <br />judged by sublethal effects, Paraho JP-4 was the <br />least toxic oil, and Tosco, Paraho, and Paraho HDI <br />were the most toxic (predator success was affecte': <br />at less than 1.0 mg/L total oil). <br />Stream colonization of the plate samplers pr.. <br />duced a community represented by four maJ"1 <br />orders of aquatic insects-Ephemeroptera. Pk <br />coptera, Tricoptera, and Diptera-plus represent;,. <br />tives of Coleoptera and Mollusca. Because of Ihe <br />similarity of community response to some exposur, <br />concentrations within an oil, only the effects fron. t',,' <br />two or three of the five exposure concentration' <br />along with the control were presented Crable 4 i <br />After 96 hr in the control solution, invertebrate <br />communities were composed of 18 to 34 taxa an,' <br />151 to 211 total organisms. As the exposure con <br />centration increased, total number of organism. <br />and both number and diversity of taxa generally de <br />creased. Response of the colonized community w;!- <br />a sensitive index of toxicity when assessed on . <br />taxon basis by percentage composition of total or <br />ganisms, The most common genera or family reprc <br />senting each of the major insect orders were Baell' <br />Isoperla, Brachycentrus, and Chironomidae: the' <br />composed more than 50% of the total organism- <br />collected. The most sensitive of these genera wcr,' <br />Baetis and Isoperla. One or both showed a sigOl! <br />cant (P ~ 0.05) reduction in percentage compo' <br />tion in the lowest concentration tested for all shal: <br /> <br />T0 <br />t <br /> <br />'1'bxicitY <br /> <br />f.ble 3. <br />success ( <br />-- <br /> <br />Oil <br />',nd <br />concentL <br />(~) <br />~ <br />(jeokinel <br />Contro <br />0.8 <br />1.4 <br />2.2 <br />Tosco <br />Contro <br />0.9 <br />1.1 <br />1.8 <br />Paraho <br />Contro <br />0.5 <br />0.9 <br />1.7 <br />Paraho H <br />Contro <br />0.8 <br />I.J <br />2,4 <br />r-raho 1 I <br />('ontro <br />U.1l <br />1.3 <br />2.1 <br /> <br />· Numbcl <br />prey SUCl <br />· Mean b <br />t Signific, <br />· Significl <br /> <br />oil prod <br />one of <br />compos <br />sure co <br />.'cre in <br /> <br />Discussi <br /> <br />The ch <br />crude a' <br />the WS <br />from th <br />where ( <br />1984; G <br />Contain <br />35% 01 <br />IUlfur h <br />"'ale oi <br />" hydrl <br />able ref <br /> <br />:#";- <br /> <br />~ '" ~ -.., -""" ~ ~ ,~ -~ , n <br /> <br />-.....".,,'~;'~"~,.",.""",' <br />~.,'_ - N <br />