My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9470
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
9470
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:35 PM
Creation date
5/20/2009 1:38:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9470
Author
Shiozawa, D. K., M. D. McKell, B. A. Miller and R. P. Evans.
Title
Genetic Assessment of four native fishes from the Colorado River drainages in western Colorado
USFW Year
2003.
USFW - Doc Type
the results of DNA analysis.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
77
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />INTRODUCTION <br /> <br />Native fishes throughout the western United States have been impacted by water development <br />and the introduction of non-native fishes. This has resulted in a significant number of fishes <br />being federally listed as threatened or endangered. The Colorado River Basin, especially the <br />mainstem rivers, has been especially impacted by water development and non-native <br />introductions (Tyus and Saunders 2000). Concern for the non-listed native fishes of the <br />Colorado River system has caused the State of Colorado to initiate a genetics assessment of these <br />fish. This assessment is focused on determining the degree of phylogenetic uniqueness among <br />existing populations of four unlisted native fishes that inhabit warm water reaches of rivers and <br />streams entering the Colorado River system. These are speckled dace (Rhinichthys osculus), , <br />roundtail chub (Gila robusta), flannelmouth sucker (Catostomus latipinnis), and bluehead sucker <br />(Catostomus disco bolus ). <br /> <br />METHODS <br /> <br />On April 6, 2001, we received notice that the Colorado Division of Wildlife had approved <br />funding for the study of four native fishes from the Colorado River basin in the state of <br />Colorado (West Slope Native Fishes Genetics Assessment: Solicitation Number: PBA-114V. <br />We made our initial contact with CDOW regarding the scientific collection permit on April 16, <br />2001. We also began contacting various biologists and others in CDOW to gain a better <br />perspective of the distribution of the native species we were to collect and to assemble an' <br />undergraduate crew to assist in collecting and processing the fish. We trained them with regional <br />collecting trips in Utah so that they became familiar with field collecting procedures. A formal <br />permit application was submitted on June I, 2001. Additional contacts were made through June <br />with various regional offices of the CDOW so that the biologists could begin keeping specimens <br />encountered during their field surveys. The undergraduates were switched to alternate research <br />accounts while we waited for permit approval. The graduate student on the project also worked <br />in the DNA lab, receiving training on DNA protocols. During this time, while we were awaiting <br />receipt of the collecting permit, we collected various catostomids and cyprinids from Utah to <br />help anchor genetic relatedness of the same or related species along the west slope of the Rocky <br />Mountains in Colorado. These collections included speckled dace (Rhinichthys osculus) for <br />comparison to conspecifics from Colorado, longnose dace (Rhinichthys cataractae), Utah chub <br />(Gila atraria), and redside shiner (Richardsonius balteatus) to serve as outgroups for the <br />speckled dace and roundtail chub phylogenies; mountain sucker (Catostomus platyrhynchus), <br />Utah sucker (Catostomus ardens), and desert sucker (Catostomus clarki) to be used as outgroups <br />for both flannelmouth and bluehead sucker phylogenies. <br /> <br />We received the collecting permit (# 01-AQ908) on July 25,2001. In conjunction with advice <br />from CDOW biologists on collection locales, we used USGS 1: I 00,000 scale maps to select <br />prospective sampling sites prior to each sampling trip. We first selected streams classified by <br />USGS as perennial, and attempted to confirm this by downloading streamflow data from the <br />USGS website. Next, we identified potential sites along major rivers and their tributaries where <br />access appeared feasible. This list then served as a tentative itinerary for sampling trips. We <br />began our collections in the rivers of the northern portion of the state and sampled several sites in <br /> <br />I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.