Laserfiche WebLink
<br />852 <br /> <br />TYUS ET AL. <br /> <br />TABLE I.-Mean standard length (rnm) and weight (g) of rainbow trout (N = 12) in each of the six treatment groups <br />(Tl-T6) at the beginning and end of the experiment Distributions of initial and final lengths were sampled repeatedly <br />in a Monte Carlo simulation to obtain the mean and standard error (SE) of the instantaneous annual growth rate <br />distribution for each treatment <br /> <br /> 6 July 1990 7 December 1990 <br /> Growth rate <br /> Length Weight Length Weight t <br />Treatment (mm) (g) (mm) (g) Average SE <br />Tl 245.4 230.3 364.3 1,042,5 0.94 0.05 <br />T2 246.2 233.3 355.9 945.3 0.87 0.07 <br />T3 250.8 243.2 363.4 1,021.3 0.88 0.07 <br />T4 240.3 219.3 361.0 1,019.2 0.97 0.07 <br />T5 254.4 273.7 371.4 1,155.0 0.90 0.06 <br />T6 259.6 278.8 374.3 1,189.1 0.87 0.08 <br /> <br />ing, All but two fish in the surgical groups had <br />their incisions completely covered by new tissue, <br />areas from which muscle plugs had been removed <br />were filling, and holes through the pelvic fins had <br />closed over, At study termination, it was difficult, <br />in most fish, to locate the surgical lesions or sites <br />where muscle or fin plugs had been removed, At <br />that time, growth was substantial in all treatment <br />groups: mean length increased by over 100 mm, <br />and weight increased by at least four fold (Table <br />1), The Monte Carlo simulation provided growth <br />rate means and standard deviations for each treat- <br />ment, and standard errors were computed for each <br />mean using sample size of 12 (except for T6 where <br />N = 11), The means of all treatments fell within <br />the 95% confidence interval of the mean growth <br />rate for the control group (Figure 1), demonstrat- <br />ing that growth rates were not altered significantly <br />by anesthesia, surgery, or tissue removaL Thus, <br />the rainbow trout showed no chronic effects from <br />the tissue removal protocoL <br />Ninety-six razorback suckers (initial means :!:: <br />SD: length = 191.5 mm :!:: 44,7 and weight = 98,8 <br /> <br /> 1.2 <br /> 1.0 t t t t t f <br />~ <br />i <br />e 0.8 <br />CI <br />.. <br />" <br />g 0.6 <br />c <br />S <br />j 0.4 <br />.. <br />.5 <br /> 0.2 <br /> 0.0 <br /> T1 T2 T3 T4 TS T6 <br /> Treatments <br /> FIGURE I.-Mean instantaneous annual growth rate <br />(see Table 1) in length and 95% confidence interval for <br />rainbow trout by treatment <br /> <br />g :!:: 116.4) were studied for 17 months, At study <br />termination there was a great difference in growth <br />of different individuals, but overall growth was <br />slight (Table 2), No difference was detected in <br />growth rate (G) of individuals among any of the <br />treatments (Kruskal-Wallis test, P = 0.3945; Fig- <br />ure 2), Twelve of 17 razorback suckers preserved <br />for further study had been subjected to surgical <br />incisions (from four treatments), and dissection re- <br />vealed no obvious adverse manifestations (e,g" ad- <br />hesions) of surgery, Results of tissue removal in <br />razorback suckers were similar to those obtained <br />with rainbow trout, and we concluded that the tis- <br />sue removal protocol had no discernible chronic <br />effects, <br />Seventy eight bony tail chub (initial means :!:: <br />SD: length = 228.3 mm:!:: 30.7 and weight = 96,6 <br />g :!:: 41.1) were studied for 18 months, At the close <br />of the study only 22 fish survived the ich outbreak, <br />and these fish displayed only slight growth (means <br />:!:: SD: length = 2335 :!:: 28,70 and weight = 98.36 <br />:!:: 39,66; N = 22). This small number precluded <br />significance testing for differences between treat- <br />ment growth rates, but there was no difference <br />between survival of fish in the treatment groups <br />when compared with the controL Four of the seven <br />bony tail chub preserved for further study had been <br />subjected to surgical incision and, as with razor- <br />back suckers, showed no adverse internal effects <br />of surgery, <br /> <br />Discussion <br /> <br />Technological advances have made it possible <br />to examine biochemical composition of fishes by <br />use of small tissue samples (e.g" Simon et aL <br />1994; Waddell and May 1995; Fry et aL 1996), <br />Invasive tissue sampling procedures can provide <br />adequate amounts of tissues for use with a vast <br />array of techniques, but before invasive techniques <br />