Laserfiche WebLink
<br />MANAGEMENT BRIEFS <br /> <br />851 <br /> <br />\ <br /> <br />jected to surgery, the tag was injected into the body <br />cavity with a hypodermic syringe inserted about <br />5 mm posterior to the right pelvic fin, Thereafter, <br />each individual was identified by reading the 10- <br />character alphanumeric code with an electronic <br />scanner. <br />After the rainbow trout study began, it was de- <br />cided that a muscle or muscle and fin sample would <br />probably be selected by USFWS as the least in- <br />vasive method that would provide adequate tissue <br />samples for genetic analysis, In addition, liver <br />samples, although obtained by the most invasive <br />procedure, would be evaluated as the best tissue <br />to facilitate sampling for contaminants or other <br />assays. Because results from the pilot study with <br />rainbow trout were so encouraging, treatments <br />were altered somewhat for the endangered fishes, <br />The T2 treatment, which was assessment of an- <br />esthesia only in rainbow trout, was eliminated and <br />replaced by incision and suturing but not tissue <br />removal, which was T3 in rainbow trout The four <br />remaining treatments involved removal of tissue <br />in various combinations: liver only (T3), pelvic fin <br />and dorsal musculature (T4), muscle only (T5), <br />and muscle and liver (T6), <br />Bony tail chub experiments were started on 9 <br />August 1990; fish were inspected, weighed and <br />measured on 10 December 1990, 22 March 1991, <br />and 7 February 1992, Razorback sucker experi- <br />ments were started on 4 and 5 September 1990; <br />fish were inspected, weighed, and measured on 11 <br />December 1990, 21 March 1991, and 7 February <br />1992, On the final date, 17 razorback suckers and <br />7 bony tail chub were sacrificed and preserved for <br />further study, <br />Data analyses,- The length and weight of each <br />fish was measured at the beginning and end of the <br />study, Because the absolute change in length or <br />weight depends, in part, on the size of the fish, an <br />instantaneous rate of growth was used to adjust <br />for the effect of size. Instantaneous growth in <br />length was calculated as follows: <br /> <br />G = (lit) X 10geCfinal length/initial length), <br /> <br />in which G = growth rate, t = time in years, and <br />length is total length (mm). This equation has been <br />reported previously as the instantaneous rate of <br />increase of mean length (Ricker 1975) and the co- <br />efficient of growth (Everhart and Youngs 1981), <br />Growth rates were calculated for each razorback <br />sucker because the fish were tagged uniquely, <br />Mean growth rates were compared among the six <br />treatments by using the Kruskal- Wallis test, a non- <br /> <br />parametric analog of one-way analysis of variance, <br />The null hypothesis was that there were no dif- <br />ferences among groups, <br />Growth rates could not be calculated for each <br />trout because individual fish within treatments <br />were not marked uniquely. Although growth rate <br />could be calculated using the average initial length <br />and the average final length in each treatment, <br />there would be no basis for a statistical comparison <br />of the rates because there would be no estimate of <br />variance, This difficulty was overcome by apply- <br />ing a Monte Carlo approach (Palisade Corporation <br />1997) that simulates the distribution of growth rate <br />values, Normal distributions were constructed for <br />fish lengths in each treatment at the beginning and <br />the end of the experiment using measured values <br />for means and standard deviations, Growth rate, <br />G, was calculated repeatedly for each treatment by <br />sampling the initial and final length distributions <br />2,000 times, The simulation creates a distribution <br />for growth rate from which the mean and standard <br />deviation are derived for each treatment <br />Disease-related mortality of bony tail chub <br />greatly reduced sample size for all treatments, and <br />precluded significance tests for differences in <br />growth rates, In this case, the Fisher exact test was <br />used to compare survival in the control group (Tl) <br />with survival in the remaining five treatments, <br /> <br />Results <br /> <br />Results for rainbow trout and razorback suckers <br />are considered first in terms of acute effects (mor- <br />tality) and then chronic effects (growth suppres- <br />sion), However, an outbreak of the disease ich <br />(Ichthyophthirius multifilis) in the bony tail chub <br />resulted in 77% mortality, and the remaining small <br />sample size precluded further testing for chronic <br />effects, <br />We detected no mortality as a result of tissue <br />removal. One of 72 rainbow trout died after jump- <br />ing out of the raceway, and 3 of 96 razorback <br />suckers died (two in T1 and one in T2), No dif- <br />ference in bony tail chub survivorship was detected <br />between the number of individuals remaining in <br />nonsurgical and surgical groups at the end of the <br />study (Fisher exact test, P = 0,500); thus, there <br />was no evidence to suggest that observed mortality <br />was the result of tissue removal. <br />Rainbow trout (initial means :!:: SD: standard <br />length = 249.4 mm :!:: 18.28 and weight = 246.4 <br />g :!:: 58.32; N = 72) were evaluated for chronic <br />effects for 7 months, By 27 September, about 10 <br />weeks after treatment, all fish subjected to tissue <br />removal were demonstrating signs of rapid heal- <br />