<br />MANAGEMENT BRIEFS
<br />
<br />851
<br />
<br />\
<br />
<br />jected to surgery, the tag was injected into the body
<br />cavity with a hypodermic syringe inserted about
<br />5 mm posterior to the right pelvic fin, Thereafter,
<br />each individual was identified by reading the 10-
<br />character alphanumeric code with an electronic
<br />scanner.
<br />After the rainbow trout study began, it was de-
<br />cided that a muscle or muscle and fin sample would
<br />probably be selected by USFWS as the least in-
<br />vasive method that would provide adequate tissue
<br />samples for genetic analysis, In addition, liver
<br />samples, although obtained by the most invasive
<br />procedure, would be evaluated as the best tissue
<br />to facilitate sampling for contaminants or other
<br />assays. Because results from the pilot study with
<br />rainbow trout were so encouraging, treatments
<br />were altered somewhat for the endangered fishes,
<br />The T2 treatment, which was assessment of an-
<br />esthesia only in rainbow trout, was eliminated and
<br />replaced by incision and suturing but not tissue
<br />removal, which was T3 in rainbow trout The four
<br />remaining treatments involved removal of tissue
<br />in various combinations: liver only (T3), pelvic fin
<br />and dorsal musculature (T4), muscle only (T5),
<br />and muscle and liver (T6),
<br />Bony tail chub experiments were started on 9
<br />August 1990; fish were inspected, weighed and
<br />measured on 10 December 1990, 22 March 1991,
<br />and 7 February 1992, Razorback sucker experi-
<br />ments were started on 4 and 5 September 1990;
<br />fish were inspected, weighed, and measured on 11
<br />December 1990, 21 March 1991, and 7 February
<br />1992, On the final date, 17 razorback suckers and
<br />7 bony tail chub were sacrificed and preserved for
<br />further study,
<br />Data analyses,- The length and weight of each
<br />fish was measured at the beginning and end of the
<br />study, Because the absolute change in length or
<br />weight depends, in part, on the size of the fish, an
<br />instantaneous rate of growth was used to adjust
<br />for the effect of size. Instantaneous growth in
<br />length was calculated as follows:
<br />
<br />G = (lit) X 10geCfinal length/initial length),
<br />
<br />in which G = growth rate, t = time in years, and
<br />length is total length (mm). This equation has been
<br />reported previously as the instantaneous rate of
<br />increase of mean length (Ricker 1975) and the co-
<br />efficient of growth (Everhart and Youngs 1981),
<br />Growth rates were calculated for each razorback
<br />sucker because the fish were tagged uniquely,
<br />Mean growth rates were compared among the six
<br />treatments by using the Kruskal- Wallis test, a non-
<br />
<br />parametric analog of one-way analysis of variance,
<br />The null hypothesis was that there were no dif-
<br />ferences among groups,
<br />Growth rates could not be calculated for each
<br />trout because individual fish within treatments
<br />were not marked uniquely. Although growth rate
<br />could be calculated using the average initial length
<br />and the average final length in each treatment,
<br />there would be no basis for a statistical comparison
<br />of the rates because there would be no estimate of
<br />variance, This difficulty was overcome by apply-
<br />ing a Monte Carlo approach (Palisade Corporation
<br />1997) that simulates the distribution of growth rate
<br />values, Normal distributions were constructed for
<br />fish lengths in each treatment at the beginning and
<br />the end of the experiment using measured values
<br />for means and standard deviations, Growth rate,
<br />G, was calculated repeatedly for each treatment by
<br />sampling the initial and final length distributions
<br />2,000 times, The simulation creates a distribution
<br />for growth rate from which the mean and standard
<br />deviation are derived for each treatment
<br />Disease-related mortality of bony tail chub
<br />greatly reduced sample size for all treatments, and
<br />precluded significance tests for differences in
<br />growth rates, In this case, the Fisher exact test was
<br />used to compare survival in the control group (Tl)
<br />with survival in the remaining five treatments,
<br />
<br />Results
<br />
<br />Results for rainbow trout and razorback suckers
<br />are considered first in terms of acute effects (mor-
<br />tality) and then chronic effects (growth suppres-
<br />sion), However, an outbreak of the disease ich
<br />(Ichthyophthirius multifilis) in the bony tail chub
<br />resulted in 77% mortality, and the remaining small
<br />sample size precluded further testing for chronic
<br />effects,
<br />We detected no mortality as a result of tissue
<br />removal. One of 72 rainbow trout died after jump-
<br />ing out of the raceway, and 3 of 96 razorback
<br />suckers died (two in T1 and one in T2), No dif-
<br />ference in bony tail chub survivorship was detected
<br />between the number of individuals remaining in
<br />nonsurgical and surgical groups at the end of the
<br />study (Fisher exact test, P = 0,500); thus, there
<br />was no evidence to suggest that observed mortality
<br />was the result of tissue removal.
<br />Rainbow trout (initial means :!:: SD: standard
<br />length = 249.4 mm :!:: 18.28 and weight = 246.4
<br />g :!:: 58.32; N = 72) were evaluated for chronic
<br />effects for 7 months, By 27 September, about 10
<br />weeks after treatment, all fish subjected to tissue
<br />removal were demonstrating signs of rapid heal-
<br />
|