Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> HUMBACK CHUB JUV (75-259mm) - GREEN RIVER HUMPBACK CHUB JUV (75-259mm) - COlORADO/YAMPA <br /> 6 <br /> 10 f (1,10.0,35.1,2.0,15.0) <br /> 0.8 0.8 n.44 4 <br />Z ~ Z ~ <br />0 0.8 0 0.6 3 <br />~ Z ~ Z <br /> W W <br />N 6 8 N :::J <br />:::; :::; 0 <br />i= 0.4 W i= 0.4 2 W <br /> a: a: <br />:::J ... :::J ... <br /> 0.2 0.2 <br /> 0 0 0 0 <br /> 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 0 10 20 30 <br /> DEPTH (feet) DEPTH (feet) <br /> f (1,0.25,2.6,1.0,80.0) 16 1(1,0.25,2.6.1.0,80.0) 16 <br /> 0.8 n.74 o.a n.74 <br />Z ~ Z ~ <br /> 10 0 10 <br />0 0.8 Z ~ 0.8 Z <br />~ w w <br /> 8 N :::J <br />N :::; 0 <br />:::; W <br />0.4 a: i= 0.4 W <br />i= ... :::J a: <br />:::J 6 6 ... <br /> 0.2 0.2 <br /> 0 0 0 0 <br /> 0.0 0.6 1.0 1.6 2.0 2.6 0.0 0.6 1.0 1.6 2.0 2.6 <br /> VELOCITY ('pa) VELOCITY ('ps) <br /> 0.8 n.32 0.8 <br />~ Z <br />0.8 0 0.8 <br />~ ~ <br />N N <br />:::; 0.4 :::; 0.4 <br />i= i= <br />:::J :::J <br /> 0.2 0.2 <br /> 0 0 <br /> CI. 81 SA OR RU BO BE OT CL 81 SA OR RU BO BE OT <br /> SUBSTRATE SUBSTRATE <br /> <br />1-74onlnt - GREEN RIVER <br />10 <br /> <br /> <br />f (1,2.1,5.1,2.0,8.0) <br />n'.71 a <br /> <br /> <br />~ <br />8 Z <br />w <br />6 <br />w <br />4 a: <br />... <br /> <br /> <br />2 <br /> <br />8.0 <br />t(fMt) <br /> <br />4.0 <br /> <br />o <br />6.0 <br /> <br />30 <br /> <br /> <br />f. &Exp(-&X) <br />G . 5.DOOOOOE-001 <br /> <br />n.67 <br /> <br />20 ~ <br />Z <br />W <br />:::J <br />o <br />w <br />a: <br />10 ... <br /> <br /> <br />o <br /> <br />o.e 0.8 1.0 <br />~TY (tpa) <br /> <br />n.71 <br /> <br />I All BO BE OT <br />STRATE <br /> <br />and interim suitability in- <br />velocity, and substrate for <br />'Y) humpback chub (n = <br />; or individual fish). <br /> <br />FIGURE 4. Raw data and interim suitability in- <br />dex curves for depth, velocity, and substrate for ju- <br />venile (IUV) humpback chub in the Green River (n <br />= number or observations of individual fish). <br /> <br />development. Never- <br />ets were developed for <br />ause the experts per- <br />~rences in habitat, par- <br />ccupied between the <br />le Colorado and Yampa <br />~n River, average water <br />niles was 2.3 feet with <br />feet, while average ve- <br />vith a maximum of 2.6 <br />4). Juvenile humpback <br />?rimarily over silt and <br />backwaters, eddies and <br />let was applied to the <br />uly through September <br /> <br /> <br />January 1990 J <br /> <br />(confidence rating of C), since no data were <br />available from other times of the year. Use <br />of this curve set was also restricted because <br />29 percent of the data were collected from <br />backwaters. <br />For the Colorado and Yampa rivers, av- <br />er~ge depth used by juveniles was 11.1 feet <br />WIth a maximum of 35.1 feet, and average <br />velocity was 0.6 ips with a range of 0 to <br />2.6 fps (Table 1; Figure 5). In contrast to <br />the data associated with the Green River, <br />these juveniles were found primarily over <br />boulders and bedrock with some sand and <br />silt substrate. This curve set applied to the <br />Colorado and Yampa rivers from July <br /> <br />[ R. A. Valdez et al. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />FIGURE 5. Raw data and interim suitability in- <br />dex curves for depth, velocity, and substrate for ju- <br />venile (JUV) humpback chub in the Colorado and <br />Yampa rivers (n = number of observations or in- <br />dividual fish). <br /> <br />through September. It received a low con- <br />fidence rating (C) but was not restricted in <br />use by the general habitat constraint. <br /> <br />Adults <br /> <br />The most reliable microhabitat data <br />available for humpback chub was for the <br />adult life stage. These data were collected <br />from various locations of the Colorado, <br />Green and Yampa rivers using radiotelem- <br />etry, electrofishing, nets, and angling. Fol- <br />lowing considerable discussion, the ex- <br />perts decided to pool the data of all strata <br />and all three rivers since the habitat used <br /> <br />39 II~ <br /> <br />