Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />HUMPBACK CHUB LARVAE ('21mm)-GREEN RIVER <br /> <br />0.8 <br /> <br /> <br />f (1,1.3,8.3,1.0,40.0) <br /> <br />n . 1498 <br /> <br />z <br />o 0.8 <br />~ <br />N <br />:J <br />i= 0.4 <br />:J <br /> <br /> <br />0.2 <br /> <br />o <br />8.0 <br /> <br />2.0 4.0 8.0 <br />DEPTH (feel) <br /> <br /> <br /> 0.8 <br />Z <br />0 0.8 <br />~ <br />N <br />:J 0.4 <br />i= <br />:J <br /> 0.2 <br /> <br />Hand Drawn <br />n . 1512 <br /> <br />o <br />3.0 <br /> <br />to 2.0 <br />VELOCITY (fp8) <br /> <br />FIGURE 2. Raw data and interim suitability in- <br />dex curves for depth and velocity for larval hump- <br />back chub (n = number of observations or individ- <br />ual fish). <br /> <br />sympatric bony tail and roundtail chub (Gila <br />robusta). Following the decision/test on the <br />criterion of river, the experts decided to <br />pool the data of all three rivers. Average <br />depth utilized by this life stage was 2.1 feet <br />with a maximum of 5.1 feet, while average <br />velocity was 0.2 feet per second (ips) with <br />a range of 0 to 1.0 fps (Table 1). YOY were <br />found predominately over silt and sand <br />substrates in backwater and eddy habitats. <br />This curve set was applied to the Green, <br />Colorado, and Yampa rivers from April <br />through October, since no field observa- <br />tions had been made at other times of the <br />year. The experts did not recommend use <br />of this SI curve set at present because 49 <br />percent of the data were taken from back- <br />waters. <br /> <br />Juveniles <br /> <br />The microhabitat used by juvenile <br />humpback chub is not well known,largely <br />because of the taxonomic problem of de- <br />finitively identifying these subadult fish <br />afield and the difficulty of sampling the <br />small fish in their turbulent habitat. Thus, <br />a relatively small amount of data were <br /> <br />I~ 38 <br /> <br />20 <br /> <br />HUMPBACK CHUB YOY (21-7.tmm) - GREEN RIVER <br />10 <br /> <br />z <br />o 0.8 <br />~ <br />N <br />:J <br />i= 0.4 <br />:J <br /> <br /> <br />16 S! <br />x <br />~ <br />10 ffi <br />a <br />w <br />a: <br />8 ... <br /> <br />0.8 <br /> <br />f (1,2.1,5.1,2.0,8.0) <br />n.71 8 <br /> <br />0.2 <br /> <br />o <br />0.0 <br /> <br />1.0 <br /> <br />2.0 3.0 <br />DEPTH (feet) <br /> <br />4.0 <br /> <br />16 <br /> <br /> <br /> 0 o.a <br /> $Z <br />10 X Z <br /> ~ 0 0.8 <br /> Z ~ <br /> W N <br /> :J :J 0.4 <br /> 0 i= <br />6 W :J <br />a: <br /> ... <br /> 0.2 <br /> <br />f. GoExp(-GoX) <br />G . 5.000000E-OOl <br />n.87 <br /> <br />o <br /> <br />0.0 <br /> <br />0.2 0.4 0.8 0.8 <br />VELOCITY (fps) <br /> <br />to <br /> <br />0.8 <br /> <br /> <br />n.71 <br /> <br />z <br />o 0.8 <br />~ <br />N <br />~ 0.4 <br />:J <br /> <br />.0.2 <br /> <br />o <br /> <br />CL Sl SA OR RU BO BE OT <br />SUBSTRATE <br /> <br />FIGURE 3. Raw data and interim suitability in- <br />dex curves for depth, velocity, and substrate for <br />young-of-the-year (YOY) humpback chub (n = <br />number of observations or individual fish). <br /> <br />available for curve development. Never- <br />theless, two curve sets were developed for <br />this life stage because the experts per- <br />ceived distinct differences in habitat, par- <br />ticularly depth, occupied between the <br />Green River, and the Colorado and Yampa <br />rivers. For the Green River, average water <br />depth used by juveniles was 2.3 feet with <br />a maximum of 4.4 feet, while average ve- <br />locity was 0.6 fps with a maximum of 2.6 <br />fps (Table 1; Figure 4). Juvenile humpback <br />chub were found primarily over silt and <br />sand substrates in backwaters, eddies and <br />runs. This curve set was applied to the <br />Green River from July through September <br /> <br />Rivers. Volume I, Number 1 <br /> <br />January 1990 <br /> <br />~ <br />8 Z <br />W <br />:J <br />o <br />W <br />4 a: <br />... <br /> <br />2 <br /> <br />30 <br /> <br />20~ <br />Z <br />W <br />:J <br />o <br />w <br />a: <br />10 ... <br /> <br />o <br /> <br />HUMBACK CHUB JUV (71 <br /> <br /> <br />0.8 <br /> <br />z <br />o 0.8 <br />~ <br />N <br />~ 0.4 <br />:J <br /> <br />0.2 <br /> <br />o <br />0.0 <br /> <br />0.8 <br /> <br />z <br />o 0.8 <br />~ <br />N <br />~ 0.4 <br />:J <br /> <br /> 0.8 <br />Z <br />0 0.8 <br />~ <br />N <br />:J 0.4 <br />i= <br />:J <br /> 0.2 <br /> <br />o <br /> <br />CL Sl SA OJ <br />SUE <br /> <br />FIGURE 4. Raw data <br />dex curves for depth, ve <br />venile (JUV) humpback <br />= number or observatio <br /> <br />(confidence rating 0 <br />available from othel <br />of this curve set was <br />29 percent of the da <br />backwaters. <br />For the Colorado <br />erage depth used by <br />with a maximum of <br />velocity was 0.6 fpl <br />2.6 fps (Table 1; Fij <br />the data associated <br />these juveniles wert <br />boulders and bedro< <br />silt substrate. This c <br />Colorado and Yan <br /> <br />I R. A. Valdez et a. <br />