My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7335
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Copyright
>
7335
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:01:45 PM
Creation date
5/20/2009 1:36:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7335
Author
Valdez, R. A. and E. J. Wick
Title
Natural Vs Manmade Backwaters as Native Fish Habitat
USFW Year
1983
USFW - Doc Type
\
Copyright Material
YES
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Table VIII. Percentage composition of native and non-native <br />fishes in Walter Walker Wildlife Area Gravel Pit <br />when isolated (I, n=734) from and open (0, <br />n=607) to [he Upper Colorado River. <br />Native Species Percentage Non-Native Percentage <br />Composition Species Composition <br />I 0 I 0 <br />silt-laden river dissipates in the pond. A layer of silt 0.3- <br />0.6 m deep covers most of the gravel substrate of the pond, <br />except for a narrow band of gravel and cobble along the wind- <br />swept shore. <br />Colorado squawfish and razorback sucker have been caught <br />in relatively large numbers in this pit [5,6], but these <br />numbers have steadily declined [3,7]. Fish composition, <br />particularly the relative abundance of native and non-native <br />species, changed dramatically with river access in 1980 <br />(Table VIII). Over 96% of the fishes in WWWA during isola- <br />tion were non-native. That composition changed dramatically <br />to 58.2% non-native and 41.8% native when river flows in- <br />undated the pit during runoff. <br />Semi-open gravel pits such as WWWA are inh abited by <br />large numbers of non-native fishes that flourish in the pit <br />year around. Many native spe-cies occupy the pit and similar <br />quiet areas during spring runoff, apparently as refuges from <br />the physical rigors of the river or as staging areas for <br />spawning, or both. Kennedy [4] caught gravid female razor- <br />backs in large backwaters of the Lower Colorado River and <br />suggests that spawning may occur in these habitats. Gravel <br />flannelmouth black bullhead 32.3 22.1 <br />sucker 0.5 29.3 common carp 28.5 16.8 <br />roundtail chub - 10.5 green sunfish 25.1 6.4 <br />Colorado <br />channel catfish 6.8 <br />5.6 <br />squawfish 0.8 0.8 <br /> white sucker 2.0 1.5 <br />razorback <br />sucker 2.6 0.8 largemouth bass 0.7 0.5 <br />bluehead sucker - 0.2 bluegill 0.4 - <br />flannelmouth x black crappie 0.3 0.3 <br />razorback - 0.2 northern pike - 0.2 <br />Totals: 3.9 41.8 red shiner - 4.5 <br />,_ sand shiner - 0.3 <br /> Total: 96.1 58.2 <br />pits may also serve as staging and possibly spawning areas <br />for Colorado squawfish and razorback sucker; tuber culate <br />squawfish and razorbacks releasing eggs and milt were caught <br />in WWWA and Clifton Ponds in May and June 1980. The large <br />complement of predaceous fishes in these gravel pits pr obably <br />precludes any spawning s uccess by these rare species. Native <br />fishes appear extremely sensitive to water levels in these <br />pits and will leave t hem with descending flow to avoid <br />being stranded in the i solated pits. Razorback sucke r were <br />observed moving between Clifton Ponds and the Colorado River <br />on a nearly daily basis with fluctuating water levels. <br />HABITAT ENHANCEMENT <br />Habitat requirements of the protected native fishes <br />of the Upper Colorado River System are not completely <br />understood. Those that are known differ by species and life <br />stages; habitat features used by one species or life stage <br />are not likely to satisfy the needs of another. For example, <br />small, low-water embayments and backwaters are used by yoy <br />and some small juvenile Colorado squawfish as well as some <br />yoy and juvenile humpback chub. Medium-sized features are <br />used by juveniles of both species at all flow stages. Large <br /> <br />532 <br />5 '~'~ <br />Figure 6. Aerial view of a large abandoned gravel pit at <br />Walter Walker Wildlife Area on the Upper Colorado <br />River, river mile 163.6. Note the narrow gravel <br />berm separating the pit from the river and the <br />single high-water opening. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.