Laserfiche WebLink
<br />e <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />1990] <br /> <br />GREEN RIVER FISH ECOLOGY <br /> <br />37 <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />TABLE 3. Contents of 61 walleye (Stizostedion vitreum) stomachs taken in the Green River basin, Utah and <br />Colorado, 1984-1989. <br /> <br />Species <br /> <br />Statusa <br /> <br />Frequency <br />(%) <br /> <br />unidentified fish <br />Ictalurus punctatus <br />Pimephales promelas <br />Cyprinus carpio <br />Lepomis cyanellus <br />Catostomus latipinnis <br />unidentified Cyprinidae <br />Ictalurus melas <br /> <br />1 <br />1 <br />I <br />I <br />N <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />empty <br />fish eggs <br />vascular plant material <br /> <br />aN = native species, I = introduced species. <br /> <br />1987, and it was first captured below Green <br />River, Utah (km 192), in 1988. This invasion <br />and downstream movement is supported by <br />both the absence of the fish in the Green River <br />in the early 1970s (Holden and Stalnaker <br />1975) and a first report of pike in the lower <br />Green in 1988 (M. Moretti, personal commu- <br />nication). Although movements of northern <br />pike in large rivers remain poorly docu- <br />mented, some studies in lakes and small <br />streams have shown that the fish can display <br />high mobility (Miller 1948, Ross and Winter <br />1981) but may move only short distances at a <br />time (Cook and Bergersen 1988). Our recap- <br />ture of two northern pike indicated that the <br />fish can move long distances (> 75 km/year) <br />in the Yampa River. Long-distance upstream <br />and downstream movement of radiotagged <br />northern pike has also been reported by <br />T. P. Nesler (personal communication). <br />The majority of fishes consumed by north- <br />ern pike in this study were soft-rayed forms <br />(Table 2), as previously noted by others <br />(Beyerle and Williams 1968, Weithman and <br />Anderson 1977, Wolfert and Miller 1978). <br />Channel catfish, the only spiny-rayed fish <br />consumed, was found in two stomachs. We <br />could not positively identify roundtail chub, <br />Gila robusta, in northern pike stomachs taken <br />from the Yampa River, but presumably one <br />Gila spp. was a roundtail chub. T. P. Nesler <br />(personal communication) reported that <br />roundtail chub were present in northern pike <br />stomachs he examined from the Yampa River. <br />Most oftpeJ:1ike\ve examined. were from the <br />Green River where roundtailchub are rare <br /> <br />Number <br />of prey <br /> <br />FISHES <br />38 <br />37 <br />35 <br />4 <br />4 <br />1 <br />2 <br />1 <br /> <br />16.4 <br />16.4 <br />9.8 <br />6.6 <br />3.3 <br />1.6 <br />1.6 <br />1.6 <br /> <br />OTHER <br /> <br />39.3 <br />1.6 <br />1.6 <br /> <br />(Tyus et al. 1982, Fishes of upper Colorado), <br />and this may have resulted in the relative <br />absence of roundtail chub as prey in pike <br />stomachs we examined. <br />Northern pike may spawn in the main- <br />stream Green River, but if so, recruitment is <br />low. We did not capture small northern pike <br />(< 321 mm TL) in this study, and, to our <br />knowledge, pike reproduction has not been <br />noted by others. However, one 115-mm-TL <br />specimen was seined by HMT and others <br />from a shoreline area of the Green River in <br />Dinosaur National Monument on 8 July 1988. <br />It is not known whether this fish hatched in <br />the Green River or was transported there <br />from another location. Also, we captured sev- <br />eral ripe female pike, and it is possible that <br />some of these fish spawned in the Green <br />River. Most ripe female pike (76%) had empty <br />stomachs, suggesting a reduction in feeding <br />activity with increasing water temperatures <br />and ripening ovaries (Frost 1954, Lawler <br />1965). <br />Walleye were rare in the Green River, and <br />their long period of residency suggests that <br />their numbers will probably not increase. <br />Walleye were easily captured by electrofish- <br />ing, and very few fish that we sighted escaped <br />capture. However, it was difficult to capture <br />northern pike with electrofishing, and many <br />fish escaped. A direct comparison of the rela- <br />tive. abundance of walleye with that of north- <br />ern pike could be somewhat misleading, and <br />it is noted that walleye were more rare, and <br />northern pike more abundant, than indicated <br />by electrofishing catch rates. We captured <br />