My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7779
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Copyright
>
7779
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:01:46 PM
Creation date
5/20/2009 1:35:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7779
Author
Tyus, H. M. and J. M. Beard
USFW Year
1990
Copyright Material
YES
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />e <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />1990] <br /> <br />GREEN RIVER FISH ECOLOGY <br /> <br />37 <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />TABLE 3. Contents of 61 walleye (Stizostedion vitreum) stomachs taken in the Green River basin, Utah and <br />Colorado, 1984-1989. <br /> <br />Species <br /> <br />Statusa <br /> <br />Frequency <br />(%) <br /> <br />unidentified fish <br />Ictalurus punctatus <br />Pimephales promelas <br />Cyprinus carpio <br />Lepomis cyanellus <br />Catostomus latipinnis <br />unidentified Cyprinidae <br />Ictalurus melas <br /> <br />1 <br />1 <br />I <br />I <br />N <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />empty <br />fish eggs <br />vascular plant material <br /> <br />aN = native species, I = introduced species. <br /> <br />1987, and it was first captured below Green <br />River, Utah (km 192), in 1988. This invasion <br />and downstream movement is supported by <br />both the absence of the fish in the Green River <br />in the early 1970s (Holden and Stalnaker <br />1975) and a first report of pike in the lower <br />Green in 1988 (M. Moretti, personal commu- <br />nication). Although movements of northern <br />pike in large rivers remain poorly docu- <br />mented, some studies in lakes and small <br />streams have shown that the fish can display <br />high mobility (Miller 1948, Ross and Winter <br />1981) but may move only short distances at a <br />time (Cook and Bergersen 1988). Our recap- <br />ture of two northern pike indicated that the <br />fish can move long distances (> 75 km/year) <br />in the Yampa River. Long-distance upstream <br />and downstream movement of radiotagged <br />northern pike has also been reported by <br />T. P. Nesler (personal communication). <br />The majority of fishes consumed by north- <br />ern pike in this study were soft-rayed forms <br />(Table 2), as previously noted by others <br />(Beyerle and Williams 1968, Weithman and <br />Anderson 1977, Wolfert and Miller 1978). <br />Channel catfish, the only spiny-rayed fish <br />consumed, was found in two stomachs. We <br />could not positively identify roundtail chub, <br />Gila robusta, in northern pike stomachs taken <br />from the Yampa River, but presumably one <br />Gila spp. was a roundtail chub. T. P. Nesler <br />(personal communication) reported that <br />roundtail chub were present in northern pike <br />stomachs he examined from the Yampa River. <br />Most oftpeJ:1ike\ve examined. were from the <br />Green River where roundtailchub are rare <br /> <br />Number <br />of prey <br /> <br />FISHES <br />38 <br />37 <br />35 <br />4 <br />4 <br />1 <br />2 <br />1 <br /> <br />16.4 <br />16.4 <br />9.8 <br />6.6 <br />3.3 <br />1.6 <br />1.6 <br />1.6 <br /> <br />OTHER <br /> <br />39.3 <br />1.6 <br />1.6 <br /> <br />(Tyus et al. 1982, Fishes of upper Colorado), <br />and this may have resulted in the relative <br />absence of roundtail chub as prey in pike <br />stomachs we examined. <br />Northern pike may spawn in the main- <br />stream Green River, but if so, recruitment is <br />low. We did not capture small northern pike <br />(< 321 mm TL) in this study, and, to our <br />knowledge, pike reproduction has not been <br />noted by others. However, one 115-mm-TL <br />specimen was seined by HMT and others <br />from a shoreline area of the Green River in <br />Dinosaur National Monument on 8 July 1988. <br />It is not known whether this fish hatched in <br />the Green River or was transported there <br />from another location. Also, we captured sev- <br />eral ripe female pike, and it is possible that <br />some of these fish spawned in the Green <br />River. Most ripe female pike (76%) had empty <br />stomachs, suggesting a reduction in feeding <br />activity with increasing water temperatures <br />and ripening ovaries (Frost 1954, Lawler <br />1965). <br />Walleye were rare in the Green River, and <br />their long period of residency suggests that <br />their numbers will probably not increase. <br />Walleye were easily captured by electrofish- <br />ing, and very few fish that we sighted escaped <br />capture. However, it was difficult to capture <br />northern pike with electrofishing, and many <br />fish escaped. A direct comparison of the rela- <br />tive. abundance of walleye with that of north- <br />ern pike could be somewhat misleading, and <br />it is noted that walleye were more rare, and <br />northern pike more abundant, than indicated <br />by electrofishing catch rates. We captured <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.