Laserfiche WebLink
<br />We analyzed the bed's response to changes in discharge, and we attempted to determine <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />the discharge which caused scour and fill of the bed. Depth is only recorded during <br /> <br />direct discharge measurements, and the resolution of bed elevation data is relatively low <br /> <br />(approximately 2 per month) compared with the published daily measurements <br /> <br />determined from the stage elevation. Because of this low resolution, it was not possible <br /> <br />to determine precisely at what discharge the bed began to scour in each year directly <br /> <br />from the records. However, a decrease in thalweg elevation between two discharge <br /> <br />measurements indicates that at some time between the measurements the discharge was <br /> <br />sufficient to scour the bed. Mean daily discharges between measurements where the bed <br /> <br />elevation changed more than 0.25 m were determined and compared with discharges <br /> <br />during periods where bed elevation remained constant. We used a two-tailed t-test and <br /> <br />assumed equal variance to determine if the maximum discharges during periods of scour <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />were drawn from statistically different populations than the maximum discharges when <br /> <br />the bed elevation remained constant. We also created histograms of the mean daily <br /> <br />discharges for periods of bed stability and periods of scour to facilitate comparisons. <br /> <br />We also used the discharge records to look for long term changes in channel <br /> <br />width. The distance between right and left edge of water is recorded at the time of each <br /> <br />discharge measurement. This measurement represents the top width of the inundated <br /> <br />portion of the' channel at the given discharge, but does not define the boundaries of the <br /> <br />channel. To determine if the width of the channel has changed, we analyzed discharge <br /> <br />measurements made between 10% greater than and 25% less than what we earlier had <br /> <br />determined to be the bankfull discharge of 105 m3/s (3700 Wls). Because the location of <br /> <br />discharge measurements varied, we limited the analysis to measurements made within a <br /> <br />15 <br />