My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9658
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
9658
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:37 PM
Creation date
5/20/2009 1:35:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9658
Author
Schmidt, J. C. and K. L. Orchard.
Title
Report A - Geomorphic Analysis In Support of a Channel-Maintenance Flow Recommendation for the White River Near Watson, Utah Draft Report.
USFW Year
2002.
USFW - Doc Type
Logan, UT.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
71
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />peak in this curve represents the increment of discharge which transports the highest <br /> <br />fraction of the annual sediment load of the stream, and represents the "effective <br /> <br />discharge'., as defined by Andrews (1980). <br /> <br />Analysis of Discharge Records to Determine Threshold Discharges <br /> <br /> <br />We analyzed ar~hived USGS discharge measurements for station 09306500 for <br /> <br /> <br />the periods between September 15, 1967, and October 3,1979, and between October 29, <br /> <br /> <br />1985, and September 30, 1997. Discharge measurement notes include channel depth and <br /> <br />width, as well as the location of the measurement in relation to the gage. These records <br /> <br />provide documentation of long term changes in channel geometry and seasonal <br /> <br />fluctuations in bed elevation (Smelser and Schmidt, 1997). At low discharges, <br /> <br /> <br />measurements were typically made within 75 meters up or downstream from the gage <br /> <br />with a wading rod. At higher discharges, measurements were made with a sounding <br /> <br />weight suspended from the cableway located at the gage. Actual discharge <br /> <br />measurements were made approximately twice each month during the period of time <br /> <br />while the gage was maintained, and were used to establish a stage-discharge rating <br /> <br />relation. Measured discharges, cross-sectional area, mean depth, maximum channel <br /> <br />depth, and distance of the measurement from the gage were transferred from the records <br /> <br />into a spreadsheet and analyzed. <br /> <br />The elevation of the thalweg was calculated by subtracting the maximum depth <br /> <br />during a discharge m.easurement from the stage elevation at the time of measurement. <br /> <br />All elevations were adjusted to a common datum for comparison. The temporal sequence . <br /> <br />of thalweg elevation through time was compared to the record of mean daily discharge. <br />14 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.