Laserfiche WebLink
<br />11/14/01 draft report, Schmidt and Box <br /> <br />distribution of larvae. We use the model to predict the effects of Flaming Gorge Dam on the <br />distri bution of larval fish. We also evaluate the accuracy of model predictions, the adequacy of field <br />measurements, and comment on the present understanding of the processes that determine larval <br />fish distribution in the middle Green River. Our results demonstrate that the spatial distribution of <br />critical nursery habitat partly results from species adaptation to the unique attributes of the <br />hydrology and geomorphology of this part of the Colorado River basin. Dam operations have the <br />potential to eliminate these unique attributes. <br />Background <br />Many attributes and functions of lotic ecosystems are partly controlled by the geomorphic <br />characteristics of the host stream and its floodplain (Power et al. 1988, 1995). These geomorphic <br />characteristics are in turn determined by the hydrology and sediment transport of the stream, as well <br />as by the lithology and structure of the geologic formations within which the channel/floodplain <br />system is established. The influence of geologic characteristics on channels and floodplains, and <br />ultimately on lotic ecosystems, primarily arises because lithology and structure control valley width, <br />the linkage between hillslopes and channel, and the location and characteristics of tributary inflow. <br />These controls are prominent in small and intermediate-size watersheds in mountainous terrain <br />(Gregory etal. 1991; Grant and Swanson 1995), but geologic control may also occur where large <br />rivers cross mountains or high plateaus. <br />Few large river systems in North America are more dominated by their surrounding <br />geology than the Colorado River and its major tributaries, the Green, San Juan, and Gila Rivers. <br />These streams cross more geologic barriers than any other in North America (Hunt 1969). Narrow <br />valleys occur where the surrounding rocks are relatively hard, and wide valleys occur where the <br />surrounding rocks are erodible (Fig. 2). There are reaches of the middle Green River with wide <br />alluvial valleys and low-gradient gravel or sand-bed channels, and there are narrow canyons with <br />gravel or sand beds or with rapids and large eddies immediately downstream. The downstream <br />changes in channel form are not progressive and do not resemble those on which the river <br />o continuum concept (Vannote et al. 1980) is based. _ <br />) v r '_ The,middle Green River begins at the confluence of two co-equal branches, the upper Green <br />'\ V/,- \7 River and the Yampa Ri ver; th~Illean annual flow and annual floods of th~~e~ranches are similar <br />I 0' ; \. (Grams and Schmidt in pres~)/ Average annual stream flow of the middle Green River increased <br />v " <br />1 about 70 percent and ~us~nded-s~diment l~ increased by about 120 percent downstr~ from <br />i the Duchesne and White Rivers pnor to extensl ve water development (loms et al. 1965). _ <br />A unique assemblage of native fish species has developed within this geologically-isolated <br />basin, and the fishery of the Colorado River basin has the highest degree of endemism (74% of all <br />species) of any large basin in the United States (Williams et al. 1989). Prior to extensive water <br /> <br />4 <br /> <br />..... <br />