My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9665
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
9665
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:37 PM
Creation date
5/20/2009 1:34:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9665
Author
Schmidt, J. C. and J. B. Box.
Title
Controls on the Longitudinal Distribution of Age-0 Colorado Pikeminnow in the Middle Green River, Colorado and Utah - Draft Report.
USFW Year
2001.
USFW - Doc Type
Logan, UT.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
57
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />11/14/01 draft report, Schmidt and Box <br /> <br />Introduction <br />Aquatic species may develop survival strategies that exploit specific segments (sensu Graf <br />2(01) of a river system at specific life stages and at specific times. The most obvious example of <br />this is the return of spawning salmon to specific reaches of headwater streams, despite long and <br />difficult passage. Gaining insight about the role of specific river segments in the life history of <br />endangered endemic species requires integration of several scientific disciplines within a geographic <br />context. An interdisciplinary perspective is necessary, because the ecological importance of specific <br />river segments depends on the life history strategy of the species in relation to watershed <br />hydrology, sediment transport, and geomorphology, as well as temperature, food base, nutrients, and <br />non-native species. <br />Analysis of the underlying ecological importance of specific river segments also has <br />practical importance to river management. In some cases, populations of endemic species decline to <br />the point of extirpation. When endangered aquatic species are affected by dams, federal regulatory <br />programs require that actions be taken to mitigate those adverse impacts that threaten the survival of <br />these species in segments designated as "critical habitat." Thus, it is essential to understand the <br />controlling factors that cause specific segments to be "critical" to species survival. Mitigating <br />actions required of dam operators are potentially costly, and it is essential to understand the role of <br />the biotic and abiotic factors that influence the survival of endangered species, because only some <br />abiotic factors are affected by dam operations. <br />The Colorado pikeminnow (Ptychocheilus lucius) is one endangered species whose survival <br />has been adversely affected by transformation of river hydrology, fragmentation by dams, de- <br />watering caused by diversions, and introduction of competitive and predatory non-native species. <br />The fish is endemic to the Colorado River basin and was common in all of the basin's large rivers <br />prior to extensive water development. The species is the largest minnow native to North America <br />(Tyus 1991) and was listed as endangered by the U.S. Bureau of Sport Fisheries and Wildlife in <br />1967. There is a longstanding conflict between water development and endangered species <br />preservation in the Colorado River basin, because the watershed also has the largest proportion of <br />res~rvoir storage to river discharge of any large basin in North America (Hirsch et al. 1990). <br />Presently, some of the large dams in the upper Colorado River basin are required to release flood <br />flows and/or base flows to improve the long-term success of the Colorado pikeminnow. These <br />releases of water are intended to achieve specific target discharges in specific target segments of the <br />Colorado River system. <br />In this paper, we evaluate the longitudinal distribution oflarval Colorado pikeminnow <br />nursery habitat in 185 Ian of the middle Green River of Colorado and Utah (Fig. 1). This <br />evaluation is based on analysis of ecological sampling data for 1990-1995 and on a simulation <br />model that we developed as a tool to understand the abiotic factors that control the longitudinal <br /> <br />3 <br /> <br />.... <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.