Laserfiche WebLink
<br />\095 The'II'lfJ!J <br /> <br />REGULATED RIVERS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT. VOL. 11,227-238 (1995) <br /> <br />'612V <br /> <br /> <br />HABITAT REHABILITATION ON THE UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER <br /> <br />CHARLES H. THElLING <br /> <br />Illinois Natural History Survey-Long Term Resource Monitoring Program, Pool 26 Field Station, 4134 Alby Street, <br />Alton, IL 62002, USA <br /> <br />ABSTRACT <br /> <br />Upper Mississippi River ecological integrity has been severely compromised by human activity during the last 50 years. <br />In response to the continuing decline of natural resource values, two approaches for protecting and improving the Upper <br />Mississippi River-floodplain ecosystem have been used. Habitat rehabilitation and enhancement projects are being con- <br />structed at 54 locations to provide site-specific rehabilitation. The projects are designed to counteract the adverse eco- <br />logical effects of sedimentation through (I) flow introductions, (2) the isolation of backwaters; and (3) flow diversions <br />and wave breaks. Channel maintenance projects are being re-evaluated in an attempt to construct or modify existing <br />river training structures that are environmentally sympathetic. The latter approach works with the river's energy, <br />whereas the former attempts to overcome riverine processes. Both approaches have significant limitations because <br />they affect limited areas. A proposal is presented that restores some ecosystem integrity by re-establishing occasional <br />low river stages that occurred before the implementation of the Upper Mississippi River Navigation System. <br /> <br />KEY wows: Mississippi River; restoration; rehabilitation; river engineering; navigation <br /> <br /> <br />INTRODUCTION <br /> <br />The Upper Mississippi River-floodplain ecosystem is a dynamic system that responds to abiotic controls <br />now largely defined by humans (Starrett, 1972; Bhowmik and Adams, 1986; Chen and Simons, 1986; <br />Grubaugh and Anderson, 1988; Lubinski et al., 1991). Above the confluence with the Missouri River, the <br />Upper Mississippi River Navigation System is controlled with 32 low head dams (Figure 1) to augment low <br />discharge water surface elevations to maintain a 2.7 m deep navigation channel (Figure 2). Below the <br />Missouri River confluence to the Ohio River the channel is maintained with channel training structures <br />(dikes) and dredging only (Chen and Simons, 1986). High river stages (floods) are unaffected by navigation <br />dams and dikes (Chen and Simons, 1986; Lubinski et al., 1991; Sparks, 1992; 1995), but levee districts have <br />sequestered much of the floodplain. More than 50% of the Illinois River floodplain (Starrett, 1972), about <br />50% of the Upper Mississippi River floodplain below navigation reach 19 to the Missouri River (Peck and <br />Smart, 1986) and nearly the entire floodplain below the Missouri River confluence (Peck and Smart, 1986) is <br />protected by levees. <br />High sediment delivery from a largely agricultural basin (Starrett, 1972; Nielsen et al., 1984) is gradually <br />filling slow-flowing non-channel aquatic habitats (backwaters and side-channels) created and maintained by <br />the dams (Bhowmik and Adams, 1986). Ecological succession is evident from dynamic aquatic and wetland <br />plant communities that have developed in response to reduced water depths and new terrestrial habitats <br />(Peck and Smart, 1986; Sparks et al., 1990). Forests, disturbed originally by the direct effects of logging and <br />inundation, continue to be affected by water-table disturbances imposed by navigation dams (Nelson et al., <br />1994). Initial increases in fish populations after dam construction (especially lentic species; Fremling and <br />Claflin, 1984) were followed by declines in commercial fisheries (Sparks, 1984; Fremling et al., 1989). <br />Some river reaches are severely compromised with respect to the ecological integrity of the river- <br />floodplain ecosystem, whereas other reaches maintain much of their original ecological form and function <br />(Sparks, 1984; Chen and Simons, 1986; Peck and Smart, 1986; Sparks et al., 1990; Sparks, 1995). Some issues <br />of river-floodplain development are regionalized in the northern (dams and backwater sediment resuspen- <br />sion) or southern (levees and dikes) regions of the system, whereas others are system-wide concerns <br /> <br />CCC 0886-9375/95/060227-12 <br />~ 1995 by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. <br /> <br />Received 15 July 1994 <br />Accepted 7 February 1995 <br />