My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7987
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Copyright
>
7987
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:01:46 PM
Creation date
5/20/2009 1:33:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7987
Author
Sheldon, A. L.
Title
Conservation of Stream Fishes
USFW Year
1988
USFW - Doc Type
Patterns of Diversity, Rarity, and Risk
Copyright Material
YES
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Sheldon <br /> <br />The Riverine Archipelago <br /> <br />A higher order of faunal complexity is imposed on river <br />systems by major watershed divides, the largest lowland <br />rivers, and saltwater barriers. Some of these barriers <br />have been breached by low sea levels during the Pleis- <br />tocene and stream capture so rivers are not only insular <br />but archipelagic. <br />Interdrainage differentiation of fish faunas is shown in <br />Figure 5. Faunal dissimilarity was calculated from data in <br />Hocutt & Wiley (1986) and Stauffer et al. (1982) using <br />Preston's (1962) resemblance equation. Preston's index <br />z ranges from 0 (complete identity) to 1.0 (no species <br />in common). Preston (1962) proposed that z = .27 <br />implies "isolates in equilibrium" under his hypothesis of <br />the canonical lognormal distribution of species abun- <br />dances. <br /> <br /> <br />f <br />e . <br />I t.........:.67 /-27- <br />.24/ ............... <br />.15'p"C .2~1 <br />190 '\. h <br />cio~.66 0 .31\i <br />d .2o\i <br />U 22y>V --ll-~ .2~~02 <br />. 48 ,. k <br />0_0 t . 1'.16 <br />.36 \ .Is/.m <br />.66 o......-:..n <br />36 q · .27 <br />~._ .24/ <br />S. r .53 .~p <br /> <br /> <br />Figure 5. Faunal dissimilarity (Preston's z) of <br />nearby drainages in the Mississippi (0) and Gulf <br />Coast-Atlantic (e) regions. a Big Sandy b. Guyan- <br />dotte c Kanawha (excluding New) d New e Monon- <br />gahela f. Susquehanna g. Potomac h. James <br />i. Roanoke j Tar k. Neuse l Cape Fear m. Pee Dee <br />n Santee 0. Savannah p. Altamaha q. Apalachicola <br />r. Mobile.\: Pearl t Tennessee u. White v. lower Cum- <br />berland UJ. Cumberland above falls. <br /> <br />Conservation of Stre8IlI Fishes <br /> <br />153 <br /> <br />Neighboring rivers on the Atlantic coast and within <br />the Mississippi system are differentiated to a degree that, <br />especially in the coastal rivers, approaches that of "iso- <br />lates in equilibrium." Gulf coast drainages are more <br />strongly differentiated. (This region is also one in which <br />intraspecific genetic similarities between drainages are <br />low [Bermingham & Avise 1986].) The greatest dissim- <br />ilarities are between drainages separated by the coastal- <br />Mississippi divide (e.g., the Potomac and the Mononga- <br />hela, the Mobile and the Tennessee). Kanawha Falls <br />isolates the New River from the lower Kanawha to a <br />comparable degree. The upper and lower Cumberland <br />are less differentiated. (In this calculation I assumed that <br />several species presently found in tributaries below the <br />falls are upper Cumberland species transferred by head- <br />ward erosion of the falls [Starnes & Etnier 1986]. Alter- <br />natively, these species may be ecologically restricted to <br />the Cumberland Plateau physiographic region.) A single <br />trans-Mississippi comparison (the Tennessee and the <br />White) shows the effect of isolation of the Ozark and <br />Appalachian uplands by lowland and large river habitats. <br />Faunal distinctions among rivers are being eroded by <br />introductions from other continents (Courtenay & <br />Stauffer 1984) and transfers within North America <br />(Moyle et al. 1986). Stocking of game and forage fishes, <br />aquarium releases, and bait-bucket introductions have <br />all contributed to the breakdown of regional unique- <br />ness. <br />Proportionally, the effects of introductions are espe- <br />cially noticeable in the depauperate faunas of western <br />drainages. For example, the fauna of the Clark Fork in <br />western Montana (Fig. 1) has been trebled by introduc- <br />tions (Brown 1971), to the clear detriment of some <br />native fishes such as the cutthroat trout Salmo clarki <br />(Allendorf & Leary, this issue). <br />Introductions are less obvious in the diverse faunas of <br />the southeast. The New River, in which 43% of the <br />fishes are nonnative (Hocutt et al. 1986), is a regional <br />extreme, and Jenkins's (1987) careful analysis indicates <br />from 12 to 32% of the species in 11 other Virginia drain- <br />ages were introduced Most of these introductions oc- <br />curred in the last 30 years and adverse effects on the <br />native fishes are not apparent. However, diverse faunas <br />are not immune to impacts from introduced species, <br />and Lemley (1985) has documented reductions of na- <br />tive fishes in North Carolina streams by introduced <br />green sunfish, Lepomis cyanellus. <br />Wholesale invasions become possible when drainages <br />are linked by navigational or hydroelectrical projects. <br />Catastrophic changes in the Great Lakes (Smith 1968) <br />were triggered by invading species (lamprey, alewife) <br />entering through navigation canals. Balon et al. (1986) <br />predict reciprocal invasions when the Rhine-Danube <br />ship canal is completed. In the United States, two (Mo- <br />bile, Tennessee) of the richest (Fig. 1) and most distinc- <br /> <br />Conservation Biology <br />Volume 2, No. 2,June 1988 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.