Laserfiche WebLink
<br />152 <br /> <br />Consemllion of Slreun Fishes <br /> <br />... <br /> <br />upland forms. Wiley & Mayden (1985) map vicariant <br />fishes separated by large rivers. In summary', a mixture <br />of ecological and evolutionary processes governed by <br />the template of watershed geometry (Leopold, Wolman, <br />& Miller 1964; Richards 1982) is capable of producing <br />a strong positive dependence of fish diversity on drain- <br />age area. If diversity depends on area, drastic alteration <br />of drainages can be expected to reduce diversity in <br />streams remote from those directly affected by pollu- <br />tion or impoundment (Sheldon 1987). <br />Figure 4 contrasts species-area relationships in tribu- <br />taries of the Mississippi with presently isolated streams <br />draining to the Atlantic and Gulf of Mexico. All the <br />streams lie in regions of fairly similar rainfall, runoff, and <br />physiography. The independent coastal drainages con- <br />sistently support fewer native fishes than intercon- <br />nected streams of comparable area in the Mississippi <br />system. <br />An especially vivid demonstration of insular effects <br /> <br />200 <br /> <br />100 <br /> <br />en <br />w <br />u <br />W <br />Q. <br />en <br /> <br />10 <br />1000 <br /> <br />Sheldon <br /> <br />(Fig. 4) is provided by two Mississippi tributaries iso- <br />lated by waterfalls (Stauffer et al. 1982; Hocutt et al. <br />1986). Although proximate ecological factors, such as <br />water chemistry and lack of lowland habitats, may be <br />involved, the low diversities of fishes in the New River <br />above Kanawha Falls and the upper Cumberland river <br />above Cumberland Falls are consistent with an hypoth- <br />esis of extreme insularity. (Both streams contain en- <br />demic fishes.) Even small streams having free inter- <br />change with larger systems support many fish species. <br />For example, Cicerello & Butler (1985) reported 73 <br />species from Buck Creek, Kentucky (drainage area 767 <br />km2), which is a tributary of the Cumberland below the <br />falls. Excluding 15 species associated with the low- <br />gradient downstream reaches, which are influenced by <br />an impoundment on the Cumberland River, and three <br />introduced or recently invading species, leaves a richer <br />fauna than that of the nearby much larger upper Cum- <br />berland. <br /> <br />100,000 <br /> <br />10,000 <br /> <br />AREA (km2) <br /> <br />Figure 4. Species-drainage area curoes for Mississippi tributaries (0), independent Gulf and Atlantic drainages <br />(e), and Mississippi tributaries isolated by major waterfalls (()). a. Guyandotte b. Big South Fork Cumberland <br />c Little Kanawha d. Licking e. Big Sandy J Kentucky g. Green h. Cumberland i. Tennessee j Mobile k Santee <br />l Pearl m. Escambia n Neuse o. York p. Rappahannock q. Cumberland above falls r. Pascagoula oS: Roanoke <br />t. Savannah u. James v. Pee Dee w. Apalachicola x Potomac y. Susquehanna z New. <br /> <br /><:on.av.tlon Biology <br />Volu~ 2. No. 2.)unc 1988 <br />