Laserfiche WebLink
<br />8000 <br /> <br />7000 <br /> <br />6000 <br /> <br />....... <br />~ <br />~ 5000 <br /><5 <br />~ <br />S 4000 <br />C<:l <br />v <br />t: <br />'" <br /> <br />Natural Flow <br />Hydrograph __ <br /> <br />2000 <br /> <br />Conventional <br />Stair-stepped <br />InstreamFlow <br />Water Right <br /> <br /> <br />3000 <br /> <br />1000 <br /> <br />o <br /> <br />Oet Nav Dee Jan Peb Mar Apr May Jun JuI Aug Sep <br />FIGURE 2. Conventional Stair-Stepped Instream Flow Water Right <br /> <br />Another improvement is to add one differential flow to a constant year-round base <br />flow amount. In protecting the Little Bighorn River bordering the Little Bighorn <br />National Monument, the State of Montana and the NPS agreed to a year-round instream <br />right of 51 cfs in addition to a IS-day spring peak flow of 950 cfs (Mont. Code Ann. 9 <br />85-20-501, Art. II, S F). The result is a single, dramatic step up and then down from the <br />base flow value that may still not protect all of the river's hydrologic variation. <br /> <br />Conventional instream flow water rights can be crafted to protect a complex or <br />dynamic range of flows with the amounts increasing as the streamflow increases, varying <br />day-to-day and year-to-year, thereby more closely simulating natural flow patterns. <br />Though never implemented, the U.S. Forest Service (USFS) and the Colorado Water <br />Conservation Board (CWCB) proposed to appropriate such a complex and variable <br />conventional instream flow water right for the Piedra wilderness area in southwestern <br />Colorado (USFS and CWCB 1992).2 Figure 3 illustrates this type of conventional <br />instream flow water right. <br /> <br />2TIle Piedra wilderness area was proposed for designation in the Colorado Wilderness Act of 1991, which <br />was never passed by Congress. The proposed Piedra wilderness was located downstream of a number of <br />previously established water rights, so any recognized federally reserved water right could potentially limit <br />the development of these upstream rights. In attempt to avoid this conflict, the 1991 Colorado Wilderness <br />Act called for the USFS to protect the Piedra River where it flowed though the proposed wilderness area <br />with an appropriative water right established under state law in conjunction with the CWCB. <br /> <br />5 <br />