<br />460
<br />
<br />Schmidt and Box
<br />
<br />Table 1. Hydrology of the Upper Green, Yampa, and Middle Green Rivers
<br />
<br />Upper
<br />Green River
<br />(09234500,
<br />Greendale,
<br />UT)
<br />
<br />Yampa River
<br />(09260050,
<br />Deerlodge
<br />Park, CO)
<br />
<br />Middle
<br />Green River,
<br />Yampa River to
<br />White River
<br />(09261000, Jensen, UT)
<br />
<br />Green River,
<br />downstream from
<br />White River
<br />(09315000,
<br />Green River, UT5)
<br />
<br />60(1923-1996) 1
<br />
<br />Mean annual
<br />flow (m' s -1)
<br />
<br />2-yr recurrence
<br />flood (m3 s - 1)
<br />
<br />Mean annual sediment
<br />load (Mg)
<br />
<br />I Grams and Schmidt (2002)
<br />2 Allred and Schmidt (1999)
<br />'Thompson (1984)
<br />4 Andrews (1986)
<br />51ncludes stream flow from the Price River and ungaged tributaries downstream from the study area.
<br />
<br />Pre-dam
<br />Post-dam
<br />Pre-dam
<br />Post-dam
<br />Pre-dam
<br />Post-dam
<br />
<br />59 (1951_1962)1
<br />58 (1963-199W
<br />339 (1931-1962)1
<br />147 (1963-1996)1
<br />3,600,0004
<br />04
<br />
<br />399 (1927-1962) 1
<br />400 (1963-199W
<br />1,900,0004
<br />1,900,0004
<br />
<br />122
<br />119
<br />626 (1923-1962) 1
<br />480 (1963-1996) 1
<br />6,500,000 (1948-1962)1
<br />2,800,000 (1963-197W
<br />
<br />Suspended-sediment transport in the middle Green
<br />River decreased 57 percent following completion of the
<br />dam (Grams and Schmidt 2002). The channel narrowed
<br />between 10 and 25 percent during the last century
<br />(Lyons, Pucherelli, and Clark 1992; Allred and Schmidt
<br />1999; Grams and Schmidt 2002), and sediment budgets
<br />suggest that the narrowed channel is capable of trans-
<br />porting all of the fine sediment now delivered from
<br />tributaries (Andrews 1986).
<br />
<br />Overview of the Early Life History of
<br />Colorado Pikeminnow
<br />
<br />As with any endangered species, the small population
<br />hinders understanding many aspects of the Colorado
<br />pikeminnow's life history. All drifting larvae in the study
<br />area are derived from Yampa River spawning sites ap-
<br />proximately 30 km upstream from the Green River
<br />(Figure 1). Spawning begins in the last half of June,
<br />during recession of the Yampa River's spring flood, and
<br />lasts about one month (Bestgen, Muth, and Trammell
<br />1998). Following emergence from the substrate, larvae
<br />drift downstream and arrive at the Green River approx-
<br />imately twelve days after spawning (Tyus 1991; Bestgen
<br />and Williams 1994; Bestgen, Muth, and Trammell 1998).
<br />The rate at which larvae enter the Green River varies
<br />greatly. During the month-long period of drift in the
<br />years of concern in this study, Bestgen, Muth, and
<br />Trammell (1998) estimated that larval abundance varied
<br />between 0 and 5,000 larvae/hr. Most of the drift in some
<br />years occun:ed on only a few days. In 1990, for example,
<br />62 percent of all larvae were caught during five of the
<br />twenty nine days of drift.
<br />
<br />156 (1930-1962)2
<br />160 (1963-1996)2
<br />740 (1930-1962)2
<br />586 (1963-1996)2
<br />19,500,000 (1930-63)3
<br />8.700,000 (1964-1982)3
<br />
<br />Larvae drift hundreds of kilometers downstream, but
<br />little is known about the mechanics or biology of this
<br />process. There is a several-week period when larvae have
<br />little swimming ability; available evidence indicates that
<br />larvae drift at the approximate speed of the main cur-
<br />rent. For example, discrete aggregations of larvae
<br />traveled 40 km in less than one day in 1990 (Bestgen,
<br />Muth, and Trammell 1998). Similar observations of
<br />drift speed have been made on the San Juan River
<br />where Dudley and Platania (2000a) simulated larval drift
<br />by adding neutrally buoyant beads. These beads
<br />traveled at approximately 80 percent of the mean stream
<br />speed.
<br />Larvae eventually are transported, or swim, into em-
<br />bayments of low, or zero, velocity adjacent to the main
<br />flow. Fish biologists call these habitats "backwaters," and
<br />they are the preferred nursery habitat for the remainder
<br />of age 0 (Tyus and Haines 1991). The greatest number of
<br />backwaters and the densest concentrations of age-O fish
<br />in the study area in late summer and fall are in the Uinta
<br />Basin where the channel is wider and the gradient is
<br />flatter than elsewhere (Figure 2). Backwaters are a
<br />wide range of sizes (Tyus and Haines 1991; Rakowski
<br />1997; Day, Christopherson, and Crosby 1999), but
<br />age-O pike minnow seem to prefer large, warm, deep, and
<br />turbid backwaters that persist for the entire base flow
<br />period (Tyus and Haines 1991; Day, Christopherson, and
<br />Crosby 1999). Tyus and Haines (1991) found that
<br />backwaters that contained age-O pikeminnow were, on
<br />average, four times larger than unoccupied backwaters.
<br />The rate at which larvae enter and leave backwaters
<br />depends on physical and biological factors, but little is
<br />known about these processes. Larvae gain swimming
<br />ability as their body size increases, their swim bladders
<br />
|