Laserfiche WebLink
<br />460 <br /> <br />Schmidt and Box <br /> <br />Table 1. Hydrology of the Upper Green, Yampa, and Middle Green Rivers <br /> <br />Upper <br />Green River <br />(09234500, <br />Greendale, <br />UT) <br /> <br />Yampa River <br />(09260050, <br />Deerlodge <br />Park, CO) <br /> <br />Middle <br />Green River, <br />Yampa River to <br />White River <br />(09261000, Jensen, UT) <br /> <br />Green River, <br />downstream from <br />White River <br />(09315000, <br />Green River, UT5) <br /> <br />60(1923-1996) 1 <br /> <br />Mean annual <br />flow (m' s -1) <br /> <br />2-yr recurrence <br />flood (m3 s - 1) <br /> <br />Mean annual sediment <br />load (Mg) <br /> <br />I Grams and Schmidt (2002) <br />2 Allred and Schmidt (1999) <br />'Thompson (1984) <br />4 Andrews (1986) <br />51ncludes stream flow from the Price River and ungaged tributaries downstream from the study area. <br /> <br />Pre-dam <br />Post-dam <br />Pre-dam <br />Post-dam <br />Pre-dam <br />Post-dam <br /> <br />59 (1951_1962)1 <br />58 (1963-199W <br />339 (1931-1962)1 <br />147 (1963-1996)1 <br />3,600,0004 <br />04 <br /> <br />399 (1927-1962) 1 <br />400 (1963-199W <br />1,900,0004 <br />1,900,0004 <br /> <br />122 <br />119 <br />626 (1923-1962) 1 <br />480 (1963-1996) 1 <br />6,500,000 (1948-1962)1 <br />2,800,000 (1963-197W <br /> <br />Suspended-sediment transport in the middle Green <br />River decreased 57 percent following completion of the <br />dam (Grams and Schmidt 2002). The channel narrowed <br />between 10 and 25 percent during the last century <br />(Lyons, Pucherelli, and Clark 1992; Allred and Schmidt <br />1999; Grams and Schmidt 2002), and sediment budgets <br />suggest that the narrowed channel is capable of trans- <br />porting all of the fine sediment now delivered from <br />tributaries (Andrews 1986). <br /> <br />Overview of the Early Life History of <br />Colorado Pikeminnow <br /> <br />As with any endangered species, the small population <br />hinders understanding many aspects of the Colorado <br />pikeminnow's life history. All drifting larvae in the study <br />area are derived from Yampa River spawning sites ap- <br />proximately 30 km upstream from the Green River <br />(Figure 1). Spawning begins in the last half of June, <br />during recession of the Yampa River's spring flood, and <br />lasts about one month (Bestgen, Muth, and Trammell <br />1998). Following emergence from the substrate, larvae <br />drift downstream and arrive at the Green River approx- <br />imately twelve days after spawning (Tyus 1991; Bestgen <br />and Williams 1994; Bestgen, Muth, and Trammell 1998). <br />The rate at which larvae enter the Green River varies <br />greatly. During the month-long period of drift in the <br />years of concern in this study, Bestgen, Muth, and <br />Trammell (1998) estimated that larval abundance varied <br />between 0 and 5,000 larvae/hr. Most of the drift in some <br />years occun:ed on only a few days. In 1990, for example, <br />62 percent of all larvae were caught during five of the <br />twenty nine days of drift. <br /> <br />156 (1930-1962)2 <br />160 (1963-1996)2 <br />740 (1930-1962)2 <br />586 (1963-1996)2 <br />19,500,000 (1930-63)3 <br />8.700,000 (1964-1982)3 <br /> <br />Larvae drift hundreds of kilometers downstream, but <br />little is known about the mechanics or biology of this <br />process. There is a several-week period when larvae have <br />little swimming ability; available evidence indicates that <br />larvae drift at the approximate speed of the main cur- <br />rent. For example, discrete aggregations of larvae <br />traveled 40 km in less than one day in 1990 (Bestgen, <br />Muth, and Trammell 1998). Similar observations of <br />drift speed have been made on the San Juan River <br />where Dudley and Platania (2000a) simulated larval drift <br />by adding neutrally buoyant beads. These beads <br />traveled at approximately 80 percent of the mean stream <br />speed. <br />Larvae eventually are transported, or swim, into em- <br />bayments of low, or zero, velocity adjacent to the main <br />flow. Fish biologists call these habitats "backwaters," and <br />they are the preferred nursery habitat for the remainder <br />of age 0 (Tyus and Haines 1991). The greatest number of <br />backwaters and the densest concentrations of age-O fish <br />in the study area in late summer and fall are in the Uinta <br />Basin where the channel is wider and the gradient is <br />flatter than elsewhere (Figure 2). Backwaters are a <br />wide range of sizes (Tyus and Haines 1991; Rakowski <br />1997; Day, Christopherson, and Crosby 1999), but <br />age-O pike minnow seem to prefer large, warm, deep, and <br />turbid backwaters that persist for the entire base flow <br />period (Tyus and Haines 1991; Day, Christopherson, and <br />Crosby 1999). Tyus and Haines (1991) found that <br />backwaters that contained age-O pikeminnow were, on <br />average, four times larger than unoccupied backwaters. <br />The rate at which larvae enter and leave backwaters <br />depends on physical and biological factors, but little is <br />known about these processes. Larvae gain swimming <br />ability as their body size increases, their swim bladders <br />