My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9633
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
9633
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:37 PM
Creation date
5/20/2009 1:33:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9633
Author
Schmidt, J. C. and J. B. Box
Title
Application of a Dynamic Model to Assess Controls on Age-0 Colorado Pikeminnow Distribution in the Middle Green River, Colorado and Utah
USFW Year
2004
USFW - Doc Type
Annals of the Association of American Geographers
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Colorado Pikeminnow Distribution <br /> <br />459 <br /> <br /> <br />the southern Uinta Basin, 30 km downstream from the <br />confluence of the White and Green Rivers in north- <br />eastern Utah (Figure 1). We use the informal names <br />"upper" and "middle" Green River to refer to the Green <br />River upstream from our study area and within our study <br />area, respectively. <br />At their confluence, the upper Green and Yampa <br />Rivers have similar mean annual flows. Prior to dam <br />construction, the magnitude of the Yampa River's two- <br />year recurrence flood was about 18 percent larger than <br />that of the Green River (Table 1), and total runoff for the <br />flood and base flow seasons was approximately equal. <br />The post-dam hydrology of the middle Green River is <br />due to both the operations of Flaming Gorge Dam and <br />the unregulated hydrology of the Yampa River (Grams <br />and Schmidt 2002), where there are few dams or di- <br />versions. Thus, the influence of Flaming Gorge Dam on <br /> <br />11 QOQ'Q"W <br /> <br />4100'O"N <br /> <br />N <br />A <br /> <br />UINTA MOUNTAINS <br /> <br /> <br />\i~t1i'" <br />. <br /> <br />4QOO'O"N <br /> <br />11000'O"W <br /> <br />the middle Green River is not as obvious as in those <br />segments where tributary inflow is minor, such as the <br />Colorado River downstream from Glen Canyon Dam <br />(Topping, Schmidt, and Vierra 2003). Post-dam floods <br />on the middle Green River come from the Yampa River <br />because Flaming Gorge Dam has caused a 57 percent <br />decrease in the magnitude of the two-year recurrence <br />flood of the upper Green River. Between 1990 and 1995, <br />62 percent of the total stream flow of the middle Green <br />River during the snowmelt flood season between April 1 <br />and July 31 came from the Yampa River; 2 percent came <br />from ungaged tributaries, and 36 percent was released <br />from Flaming Gorge Dam. In contrast, base flows came <br />primarily from Flaming Gorge Dam; 76 percent of the <br />base flow between August 1 and March 31, 1990-1995, <br />was released from Flaming Gorge Dam and 24 percent <br />came from the Yampa River. <br /> <br />10900'O"W <br /> <br />10aoQ'O"W <br /> <br />109"O'O'W <br /> <br />Figure 1. Map showing the study area, including reaches discussed in text. Circled numbers are U. S. Geological Survey gaging stations <br />referred to in the text: (1) Green River near Greendale, Utah (09234500), (2) Yampa River near Maybell, Colorado (09251000), (3) Little <br />Snake River near Lily, Colorado (09260000), (4) Yampa River at Deerlodge Park, Colorado (09260050), (5) Green River at Jensen, Utah <br />(09261000), (6) Duchesne River near Randlett, Utah (0930200), (7) White River near Watson, Utah (09306500), and (8) Green River near <br />Ouray, Utah (09307000). <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.