Laserfiche WebLink
Volume 1 (Issue #3), 1993 X-RADIOGRAPHY IN FEEDING AND GROWTH STUDIES <br />feeding devices. When feed is supplied either from on-demand feeders, or in excess, <br />the estimation of feed intake requires that a labeled feed technique, such as the <br />X-radiographic method, be used (Talbot, 1985). <br />The estimation of daily feed intake by fish of different sizes at different water <br />temperatures provides the type of information required for the compilation of feed <br />tables (Jobling et al., 1991; Palsson et al., 1992), and such information can be <br />collected easily using the X-radiographic method. It is, however, well known that <br />there may be large day-to-day variations in feed intake by fish, especially if they have <br />been subjected to disturbance or environmental stressors. From this it follows that <br />the information from a single feed intake estimate should not be used uncritically. <br />If the aim of a study is the compilation of feed tables, repeated measurements must <br />be available for a number of groups of fish, the groups should cover a wide range <br />of fish sizes, and fish used in the feed intake studies exhibit normal growth rates. <br />The appetite of fish may be depressed for a few days following handling and <br />sorting procedures, or if the diet is changed abruptly. Because fish of several species <br />can be trained to operate on-demand feeding devices, the use of on-demand feeders <br />'enables changes in levels of feeding activity to be studied (Landless, 1976; Alanara, <br />1992a,b; Boujard et al., 1992). However, even though records from on-demand <br />feeding systems may give an accurate reflection of feeding activity, it is not possible <br />to say which or how many, of the fish within the group have been operating the <br />system. In addition, the records do not give any information either about the <br />numbers of fish that feed or about how much of the feed provided has been <br />consumed. The X-radiographic method, on the other hand, provides a suitable <br />means for investigating the recovery of appetite following exposure to changes in <br />a range of biotic and abiotic factors, and for obtaining records on the responses of <br />individual fish (Usher et al., 1991; Christiansen et al., 1992; Jtargensen et al., 1993). <br />For example, the abrupt transfer of groups of chary from freshwater to waters <br />of increased salinity led to a depression of feeding, with a decrease in feed intake <br />being recorded when measurements were made 3 days following the time of transfer <br />(Figure 1). The proportion of nonfeeding fish increased with increasing salinity <br />(Figure 1). When measurements of feed intake were repeated 30 days after the time <br />of transfer, no significant differences were recorded among the groups exposed to <br />the different salinity treatments (Figure 1). Thus, exposure to increased salinity <br />appeared to have had an acute, but short-lived, depressive effect on feed intake in <br />the Arctic chary (Arnesen et al., 1993). These results for chary differ from those <br />reported for Atlantic salmon smolts, in which appetite and growth were suppressed <br />for a period of at least 30 days following transfer from fresh- to seawater (Usher et <br />al., 1991). When studies are carried out using tagged fish, there is the possibility to <br />perform more in-depth examinations of the effects of changes in rearing environ- <br />ment on feed intake and growth. For example, although exposure to full-strength <br />seawater may have an acute depressive effect on appetite in the majority of the fish <br />within a group, pronounced and persistent reductions in feed intake and growth. <br />may be exhibited by certain individuals. Use of the X-radiographic method highlights <br />this variability, and enables these interindividual differences to be examined with <br />respect to the morphological and physiological characteristics exhibited by indi- <br />vidual fish. <br />227 <br />