Laserfiche WebLink
JOBLING ET AL. REVIEWS IN FISHERIES SCIENCE <br />previous meals must be evacuated before additional measurements can be under- <br />taken. This problem can be overcome by allowing sufficient time to pass between <br />measurements, and in long-term studies designed to examine feed-growth relation- <br />ships in the Arctic chary, the estimation of feed intake at 3-week intervals is suitable <br />(Christiansen and Jobling, 1990; Christiansen et al., 1992). <br />The X-radiographic method can give accurate estimates of feed intake under a <br />wide range of experimental conditions, but underestimation can be expected both <br />at high temperatures, when rates of feed transit are increased, and under conditions <br />when a long period elapses between the start of the measurement period and the <br />photographing of the fish. In both cases, there would be the risk that some particles <br />would be evacuated before exposure of the X-ray plates. Thus, it is of vital <br />importance that workers wishing to use the method carry out adequate preliminary <br />studies in order to test the possible limitations of the method with given species held <br />under given conditions. <br />IV. DAILY FEED INTAKE <br />The X-radiographic method allows information to be collected about the feed intake <br />of previously unstarved, relatively undisturbed fish and has, therefore, a number of <br />advantages over the methods traditionally used in studies of feeding behavior and <br />growth. Direct observation and video-recording have been widely used in laboratory <br />studies, but the monitoring of feed intake using such techniques is limited to groups <br />containing small numbers of fish. Thus, these techniques have been rarely used to <br />study feeding behavior and feed intake in large groups of fish held under conditions <br />resembling those found in commercial production facilities. Where observational <br />techniques have been used, they have been restricted to either general examinations <br />of behavioral responses to feed presentation, or to studies on focal individuals <br />(Thorpe and Huntingford, 1992). <br />Information about feed intake by groups of fish in a laboratory setting can be <br />obtained by feeding the fish by hand and ensuring that there is little or no feed <br />wastage. The information gathered refers, however, only to the total amount of feed <br />consumed by the group of fish, and provides no information about differences in <br />feed acquisition among individuals. In large-scale growth trials, the provision of feed <br />by hand may not give an adequate reflection of feed intake because there will <br />inevitably be a certain amount of feed waste. By combining knowledge about the <br />amounts of feed provided with measurements of feed intake obtained using the <br />X-radiographic method, it is possible to gain insights into the amounts of feed <br />wastage that result from different feeding practices (Thorpe et al., 1990). <br />When fish are fed by hand at predetermined time intervals, the feeding regime <br />used may impose restrictions upon the fish. For example, it is known that the timing <br />of feed provision can influence the rhythmicity of a range of physiological and <br />behavioral processes and, thus, have consequences for growth and production <br />performance (Boujard and Leatherland, 1992). It would seem that the only ways in <br />which such influences could be avoided would be either to allow the fish to feed <br />using on-demand feeding systems, or to provide feed in excess from automatic <br />226 <br />