My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9312
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Copyright
>
9312
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:01:47 PM
Creation date
5/20/2009 11:05:28 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9312
Author
Persons, W., R. V. Bulkley and W. R. Noonan.
Title
Movements of Colorado Squawfish in the Colorado River Inlet of Lake Powell.
USFW Year
1981.
USFW - Doc Type
Report No. 8,
Copyright Material
YES
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Density currents from the Colorado River inflow extend many kilo- <br />ers into the reservoir during periods of high spring flow (Johnson and <br />ritt, 1979). The inflowing water may have stimulated squawfish to <br />e upstream into the mixing zone. Low flows during 1981 might not have <br />vided the necessary stimulus for upstream movement (Figure 3). <br />During the 1980 season, (April 26 - June 18), discharge ranged from <br />m3/sec (24,060 cfs) to 1,806 m3/sec (63,790 cfs) and averaged <br />80 m3/sec (45,203 cfs). Discharge during the same period in 1981 <br />ged from 198 m3/sec (7,000 cfs) to 655 m3/sec (23,120 cfs) and <br />raged 378 m3/sec, (13,352 cfs). Seasonal and temperature differ- <br />es may also have had an effect on capture of squawfish in the mixing <br />e during 1980 and 1981. Peak catches during 1980 were in late April <br />early May (Figure 4) when water temperature ranged from 12-16° C <br />-60° F). During 1981, however, sampling was initiated until late May <br />n water temperatures already exceeded 16° C (60° F) (Figure 3). <br />Another possibility is that squawfish captured during 1980 were <br />idents of the mixing zone which resembled a large, slow moving <br />er. During 1981, habitat conditions (depth and flow) were radically <br />nged from those present in 1980. Mud and silt bars formed during 1980 <br />e exposed in 1981, the channel was narrower and shallower (3-5 meters <br />9-11 meters), current velocity was greatly reduced, and there were <br />er and smaller side eddies during 1981 than 1980 (Figure 5). These <br />.nges in the physical habitat may have made the mixing zone less <br />table for adultsize squawfish, hence fewer were collected. <br />It is difficult, if not impossible, to draw conclusions concerning <br />awfish movement based on tracking a single fish. The tagged fish, a <br />ge 4,082-gram adult, evidently moved from the mixing zone over 37 km <br />miles) toward the main body of the reservoir in less than 3 days. <br />project needs to be repeated in years of normal river flows to <br />ermine source of the squawfish and reason for their concentration in <br />Colorado River inlet area. <br />REFERENCES CITED <br />nson, N. M., and D. H. Merritt. 1979. Convective and advective <br />circulation of Lake Powell, Utah-Arizona, during 1972-1975. Water <br />Resources Research 15(4):873-884. <br />sons, W. R., and R. V. Bulkley. 1980. Adult striped <br />and feeding, Colorado River Inlet, Lake Powell, <br />Progress Report. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service <br />0008-1061. Utah Cooperative Fishery Research Unit, <br />bass movements <br />1980. Annual <br />Contract 14-16- <br />Logan. 21 pp. <br />279
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.