Laserfiche WebLink
1981. <br />Percent <br />of total <br />3.0 <br />2.0 <br />52.1 <br />12.9 <br />70.0 <br />3.5 <br />4.7 <br />8.2 <br />13.6 <br />30.0 <br />ning run <br />trt of the <br />iped bass <br />)ling was <br />iter tem- <br />ed was a <br />captured <br />iod. The <br />the pro- <br />d in the <br />d. More <br />i during <br />;e caught <br />ntage of <br />Gypsum <br />.rayfish <br />(2) <br />1(0.3) <br />STRIPED BASS IN LAKE POWELL <br />spent fish during 1981 was attributed to the higher <br />water temperatures and later sampling in 1981 <br />(Fig. 2, Table 1). <br />Location of Spawning <br />The available evidence suggested that Lake <br />Powell striped bass spawned in 1980 and 1981 <br />in the lower rapids of Cataract Canyon or in the <br />upper mixing zone of the reservoir. No striped <br />bass were captured above the rapids, but ripe <br />and spent fish were netted in the Gypsum Can- <br />yon area. The early arrival and high proportion <br />of ripe males in the catch (2.3:1) also suggested <br />that the spawning area was nearby. Unfortu- <br />nately, the large amount of debris in the area <br />prevented adequate sampling of eggs and larvae <br />with plankton nets. The three viable eggs netted <br />were in the early stages of development and pro- <br />vided further evidence that spawning occurred <br />not far upstream. <br />Food <br />Most striped bass in other populations do not <br />feed while on their spawning run. More fish feed <br />before reaching spawning condition and after <br />spawning than when fully mature (Raney 1952; <br />Trent and Hassler -1966). In our study, about <br />42% of the stomachs of immature and maturing <br />fish, 25% of those of sexually mature fish, and <br />33% of those of spent fish contained food. Of the <br />321 stomachs examined during the 2 years, 70% <br />were empty (Table 2)90 (28%) <br />threadfin shad (Dorosoma petenense), 4 held red <br />shiners (Notropis lutrensis); and 2 contained <br />remains of unidentified fish. <br />Empty stomachs can, of course, occur for rea- <br />sons other than fasting, such as rapid digestion <br />(Merriman 1941; Raney 1952), sporadic feeding, <br />and regurgitation of stomach contents by gill- <br />netted fish. In our study, most of the food in the <br />stomach and intestinal tract consisted of fish that <br />would digest at a somewhat similar rate regard- <br />less of species. Regurgitation of food by gill-net- <br />ted fish is a common phenomenon and results <br />in lower estimates of the percentage of fish feed- <br />ing. Composition of the diet is not affected by <br />regurgitation, only the percentage of stomachs <br />containing food. The somewhat similar percent- <br />age of stomachs (30%) and intestinal tracts (41 %) <br />containing food suggested that regurgitation was <br />not a major problem because regurgitation does <br />not evacuate the intestine. <br />CONCLUSIONS <br />407 <br />Our evidence strongly . suggested that Lake <br />Powell striped bass spawned near or above Gyp- <br />sum Canyon in the Colorado River inlet in 1980 <br />and 1981. The extent of upstream movement <br />probably varies from year to year, depending on <br />river flow and reservoir level. During 1980 (a <br />high-water year) and 1981 (a low-water year), no <br />striped bass were captured above the rapids. <br />The degree of success of striped bass repro- <br />duction was not determined by plankton-net <br />sampling in 1980 and 1981. Fall gill-net surveys <br />for young-of-the-year striped bass are more effec- <br />tive for determining reproductive success (Gus- <br />taveson et al. 1980). <br />No evidence was obtained to suggest that adult <br />striped bass prey on native fishes during the spring <br />and early summer while in the Gypsum Canyon <br />area. Although endemic species were not found <br />in striped bass stomachs, they were present in <br />the study area albeit in much fewer numbers than <br />were threadfin shad. Adult Colorado squawfish <br />and razorback suckers were captured with striped <br />bass in the gill nets. Four small Colorado squaw- <br />fish (67, 72, 106, and 106 mm long) were cap- <br />tured on July 15-17, 1980, just upriver from <br />Gypsum Canyon. At the same time, five adult <br />striped bass were captured at Gypsum Canyon <br />(Mike Ottenbacher, Utah Fishery Biologist, per- <br />sonal communication, 1980). One juvenile Col- <br />orado squawfish (251 mm long) was gillnetted at <br />Gypsum Canyon on July 22, 1981. Thus, squaw- <br />fish of suitable forage size were available in the <br />spawning area but none had been eaten by the <br />fish we examined. Threadfin shad currently pro- <br />vide the major food of striped bass in the res- <br />ervoir. As long as the striped bass congregate for <br />spawning below Cataract Canyon rapids and <br />threadfin shad are abundant, adult striped bass <br />probably will not prey heavily on endemic fishes <br />during the spawning run. <br />From a management standpoint, our findings <br />indicate that stocking of striped bass fry has pro- <br />duced a naturally reproducing population in <br />another Colorado River reservoir besides Lake <br />Mead. Fry stocking in Lake Powell was termi- <br />nated in 1980 because of natural reproduction. <br />Fishery managers should consider the possibility <br />of natural reproduction occurring in similar <br />waters if they anticipate controlling striped bass <br />populations through annual stocking of fry. On <br />the other hand if control of the population is not <br />a consideration, the ability of this normally anad-