Laserfiche WebLink
282 <br />masses of multiple variable data were gathered, completely reliable informa- <br />tion was lacking. The study demonstrated that there are presently unused <br />descriptive variables in need of quantification that existing methodologies <br />have not considered. Available methods failed to describe adequately pool <br />quality, streambank environment, and aquatic vegetation. In turn, the rela- <br />tionships between streambank environments and aquatic vegetation and fishery <br />values were poorly defined. These variables need intensive research because <br />they relate directly to the manipulation of vegetation by land- and <br />water-managing agencies. <br />This study demonstrates that it is the proper combination of aquatic <br />conditions, not just one variable, that is significant in producing a fishery <br />resource. In the natural environment, one variable alone usually cannot cause <br />increasing or decreasing population densities. What is important is the envi- <br />ronmental mix and how dominant variables relate to the environmental mix. <br />Thus, the development of a valid methodology becomes more complex and the <br />degree of validity more important. <br />Results of the Idaho study did demonstrate that, with adequate sampling <br />(200 samples or more), the methods used to determine mean depth, mean width, <br />composition of stream channel substrate, percent of pool, percent of riffle, <br />and channel elevation were reliable, and confidence intervals at the 95 per- <br />cent level were acceptable. However, to relate this confidence to fish popu- <br />lations will require refinement of existing methodology and the addition of <br />more variables to more adequately quantify and describe the total environmental <br />mix. Only with continual testing, refining, and development of new variables <br />will the needed validity in aquatic methodology be gained. <br />LITERATURE CITED <br /> <br />Berg, Leo S. 1947. Classification of fishes, both recent and fossil. <br />Edwards Brothers Inc. 517 p. <br />Burns, James W. 1971. The carrying capacity for juvenile salmonids in some <br />northern California streams. Calif. Fish and Game Dep. <br />57(1):44-57. <br />Chapman, D. W. 1966. The relative contributions of aquatic and terrestrial <br />primary producers to the trophic relations of stream organisms. <br />In: K. W. Cummins, C. A. Tryon, Jr., and R. T. Hartman, ed.:Organism- <br />substrate relationships in streams. Spec. Publ., Pymatuning Lab. Ecol. <br />Univ. Pittsburgh 4:116-130.