Laserfiche WebLink
281 <br />DISCUSSION <br />Aquatic systems in isolated areas may be dominated by one type of external <br />variable such as glaciation, but multiple external variables usually determine <br />stream conditions. The status of fluvial trout populations is determined <br />mainly by the internal quality of the aquatic environment. <br />In this study, the physical variables--stream elevations, widths, depths, <br />pool ratings, channel gradients, and streamside cover--substantially influenced <br />fish population densities and species composition. Elevation could be less a <br />factor than it appeared to be superficially because decreases in elevation were <br />so closely associated with increasing stream width and depth. The study data <br />infer that increasing water space, which is associated with decreasing channel <br />gradients and increasing water temperatures, had more influence on increasing <br />fish populations than did other factors. <br />Fish species preferred certain habitat types, but some species occupied <br />certain types of environments because they were limited in competitive ability. <br />This is exemplified by cutthroat trout and Dolly Varden, which occupied sec- <br />tions of streams that did not have high populations of chinook salmon and <br />rainbow trout. Total fish populations were highest near the grass-brush habi- <br />tat types because the two dominant fish species centered on these environments. <br />Chinook salmon dominated the grass type areas and the rainbow trout dominated <br />the brush type areas. Cutthroat trout numbers, however, were at their highest <br />in channels with dominant tree cover on the banks. Some species were adapted <br />only to certain ranges of stream gradient, and certain species usually peaked <br />in population density at different channel gradients. <br />In my work, erroneous interpretations of the effect of one variable on <br />fish populations could have involved gradients, elevations, fine sediment, and <br />pool-riffle ratios. For example, if I had considered fine sediments alone as <br />a dominant controlling variable, the conclusion would be that increasing amounts <br />of fine sediment in the channel would cause increased fish populations. In <br />analyzing the combination of variables, however, as fine sediments increased <br />in the stream segments, stream widths and depths, pool quality ratings and <br />percent pool evaluations increased and channel gradients decreased. All of <br />these conditions, except possibly fine sediment increases, tend to cause an <br />increase in fish populations, thus masking the true effect of fine sediment. <br />In analyzing any aquatic environment, all environmental variables and their <br />interactions must be considered. <br />In evaluating the inventory procedure as a predictor of fishery conditions, <br />flaws became apparent. The multivariate analysis demonstrated that while