Laserfiche WebLink
Table 2 <br />GOALS FOR MULTIOBJECTIVE RIVER CORRIDOR MANAGEMENT <br />- Flood Damage Reduction <br />- Erosion Damage Reduction <br />- Water Quality Protection/Enhancement <br />- Protection/ Enhancement of Recreational <br />Opportunities <br />- Wildlife and Fisheries Protection/ <br />Enhancement <br />- Improvement of Aesthetics <br />- Waterfront Revitalization and Economic <br />Development <br />The combination of high and rising costs of <br />engineering approaches, the problems associated <br />with these approaches, and the changed priorities <br />for rivers and their adjacent lands have resulted <br />in adoption of and requests for alternative <br />approaches which place greater emphasis upon <br />protection and restoration of natural river and <br />floodplain/wetland functions and values. <br />A relatively large number of such <br />multiobjective protection and/or restoration <br />efforts have been implemented for at least <br />portions of rivers and streams in the U.S. in the <br />last decade. Many more are proposed. Such <br />multiobjective management efforts include not only <br />completion of hundreds of local "greenway" <br />efforts, but establishment of parks and protected <br />areas for rivers and streams at all levels of <br />government, implementation of dozens of federal <br />and state floodplain relocation projects to clear <br />previously developed hazard-prone areas, <br />completion of many urban river and stream <br />waterfront renewal projects, establishment of <br />thousands of multiobjective wetland/stormwater <br />detention facilities, and the restoration of many <br />miles of stream and floodplain through the use of <br />"bioengineering" approaches for streambanks and <br />replanting of riparian vegetation. <br />GOVERNMENT INITIATIVES LEADING TO <br />MULTIOBJECTIVE MANAGEMENT: <br />EXAMPLES OF SUCH MANAGEMENT <br />Federal Initiatives <br />As noted above, the national trend toward <br />multiobjective river corridor management rather <br />than reliance primarily upon engineering works <br />began with House Document 465 (Task Force on <br />Federal Flood Control Policy 1966). Based upon <br />the recommendations contained in this document, <br />Congress in 1968 called upon the President to <br />prepare a report for Congress on a Unified <br />National Program for Floodplain Management (Public <br />Law No. 99-448). A federal interagency task group <br />prepared and issued such a "Unified National <br />Program" report in 1976. Revised versions were <br />issued in 1979 and 1985. In perhaps its most <br />important step to implement the recommendations, <br />Congress in 1968 authorized the National Flood <br />Insurance Program. Federally subsidized flood <br />insurance was offered for existing structures, <br />providing communities agree to regulate new <br />development to reduce flood losses. Over 17,797 <br />communities have adopted floodplain and, in many <br />instances, floodway regulations linked to the 100 <br />flood standard pursuant to this Program. More than <br />2.3 million flood insurance policies are in <br />effect. Recently the Federal Emergency Management <br />Agency (FEMA), which implements the National Flood <br />Insurance Program, adopted "community rating <br />system" _ guidelines for the Program. These <br />guidelines encourage communities to plan, <br />regulate, or otherwise manage floodplains in a <br />manner which goes beyond FEMA's minimum standards <br />so that future flood losses will be reduced. <br />Insurance rates will be reduced for communities <br />that adopt such measures which may include <br />greenways, wetland protection measures, larger <br />floodways, and other measures. <br />Since 1968, Congress has adopted a broad <br />variety of measures which have directly or <br />indirectly contributed to multiobjective river <br />corridor management by establishing environmental <br />protection goals, procedures, or programs. These <br />include adoption of: <br />- the Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (P.L. <br />91-190) which requires federal agencies to <br />prepare environmental impact statements prior <br />to actions which will significantly impact the <br />environment; <br />- a national Wild and Scenic Rivers Act of 1968 <br />(P.L. 90-542); <br />- a National Coastal Zone Management Act of <br />1972 (P.O. 92-583); <br />- enhanced cost-sharing requirements for water <br />projects through the Water Resources Develop- <br />ment Act of 1986 (P.L. 99-662); <br />- Water Pollution Control Act Amendments of <br />1972 (P.L. 92-500) and the Clean Water Act of <br />1977 which establish, in Section 04, a <br />permitting program for fills in wetlands and <br />other waters of the U.S. (Hunt, Ehorn, this <br />volume); and <br />- floodplain and erosion acquisition initia- <br />tives including Section 1362 of the National <br />Flood Insurance Act of 1968. <br />In 1990 Congress adopted a number of important <br />measures in the Omnibus Water Bill (HDM5314) which <br />favor multiobjective management of rivers: <br />- Section 12 requires the Secretary of the Army <br />(Corps of Engineers) to "include environmental <br />protection as one of the primary missions of <br />the Corps of Engineers in planning, designing, <br />constructing, operating, and maintaining water <br />resources projects" and to report back to <br />Congress on a biennial basis specific measures <br />taken to carry out these goals. <br />- Section 13 establishes "as part of the Corps <br />of Engineers water resources development pro- <br />gram, an interim goal of no overall net loss of <br />the Nation's remaining wetlands base, as <br />defined by acreage and function, and a long <br />term goal to increase the quality and quantity <br />5