Laserfiche WebLink
types of sampling gear and techniques were tried during the first sampling <br />trip. Trammel nets were floated through pools; frame nets were set overnight <br />in backwater areas; experimental gill nets were set for short time periods in <br />pools; seine hauls were made with various types of seines; electrofishing was <br />conducted; and a combination of electrofishing and seining was attempted. It <br />was found that a small, bag seine, 15 ft x 4 ft (4.5 m x 1.2 m) with 15 mm <br />stretched mesh yielded best results in slow moving back water areas. Because <br />of the high turbidity of the river, shocked fish could not be easily observed. <br />It was determined that a combination of seining and electrofishing with either <br />a generator (Olsen 240 v) located on the bank, or a backpack shocker (Coffelt <br />12 v DC battery pack) yielded best results. Sampling protocol with this gear <br />combination was as follows: the seine was stretched from the bank toward the <br />center of the river and electrofishing begun approximately 30 ft (10 m) upstream <br />from the seine and progressed downstream. Narcotized fish and those attempting <br />to avoid the electrical field were captured as the current carried them into <br />the seine. The seine was then brought to shore. This procedure was repeated <br />along approximately 1000 ft (300 m) of shoreline. At each station 300 m of <br />shoreline were sampled in this way. If larval rearing areas were present at <br />the sampling station, one or more of the backwater areas were also sampled. <br />All captured fish were identified and counted. Lengths of endemic fish <br />were determined and all fish, except those that could not be identified because <br />of their small size, were returned to the river. Unidentified specimens were <br />preserved and returned to the laboratory for identification. Rare fish were <br />weighed, measured, and tagged with an anchor tag in the epaxial muscle mass <br />just ventral to the center of the dorsal fin, and released at the point of <br />rapture. <br />Study Area: General Habitat Features <br />Fifteen sample sites were chosen between the Utah-Colorado border and the <br />Uintah and Ouray Indian Reservation eastern border (Figure l). The upper <br />portion of the river had the greatest diversity of habitat. It varied from <br />a s°ngle wide river channel to a braided channel and backwater areas. This <br />resulted in having a variety of riffles, runs and pools available for sampling. <br />Bottom substrate was composed of silt, sand, gravel and/or rubble. Water <br />velocities varied from very slow in the backwater pools to swift in some <br />portions of the main channel. Proceeding downstream, habitat became less <br />diverse as the river widened and contained fewer large backwater areas and <br />side channels. At downstream sites, the bottom substrate was mostly silt,