Laserfiche WebLink
capturing all life stages of endangered fish (razorback sucker). This information will be critical in <br />future efforts within the Basinwide Monitoring Program as well as the Levee Removal Program. <br />Site manipulation will be integrated with the levee removal strategy to address specific hypotheses <br />regarding floodplain and wetland ecology. This approach will be gradually implemented in each <br />levee removal site. <br />' Nonnative versus Native Fish Enhancement. Emphasis will be placed on the determination of <br />absolute and relative abundance changes of native and nonnative fishes as well as the interactions <br />between native and nonnative species. Past and ongoing research ( Tyus, Crowl and Lentsch <br />1995) suggest that many nonnative species now present in the Colorado River System potentially <br />limit native fish survivorship and recruitment through competition and/or predation. Channel <br />catfish, northern pike, green sunfish and smallmouth bass all pose significant threats as predators <br />of native species. Green sunfish, smallmouth bass and northern pike are known to inhabit littoral <br />or lentil habitats in Midwestern lakes and reservoirs. Thus, the effects of development and <br />management of floodplain wetlands must be assessed for nonnative as well as native fish species. <br />First, we must determine which nonnative predators will use floodplain wetlands and whether <br />increased spatial complexity provided by aquatic macrophytes (and the expected increase in YOY <br />survivorship) will offset potential losses of native species due to nonnative predation. <br />Second, we must determine if additional lentil habitat will result in a differential, long-term <br />increase in the nonnative fish abundance due to increased spawning, growth and/or survivorship. <br />If floodplain enhancement results in a differential increase in important nonnative predators (e.g., <br />green sunfish, smallmouth bass, etc.) in the river system as a whole, we should expect long-term <br />decreases in native fish populations due to increased predation. It is highly plausible to see a <br />short-term enhancement of native fishes, followed by a long-term increase in nonnative fishes <br />resulting in an overall, long-term decrease in the target native species. These 'lagged-time' <br />predator effects are commonly observed and have been well documented in the'invasion ecology' <br />literature. <br />Prioritization. Selection and Well Defined Plan for Site Development. Site prioritization and <br />scheduling has been a pervading issue in the habitat enhancement program. This strategy <br />identifies and prioritizes sites of highest importance for restoration through a randomized block <br />analysis design described in detail below. It should be noted, that while we have provided a <br />' matrix of the most feasible sites, with respect to our overall design, advantage should be taken of <br />the existing hydraulic models and data available to determine the feasibility of inundating various <br />sites (Tim OBrien, personal communication). Such endeavors are generally covered under the <br />'hydrology' section of the overall Floodplain Restoration documents. <br />6