Laserfiche WebLink
SUMMARY <br />Sediment samples were collected at six streamflow-gaging stations in <br />the Big Sandy River basin for determining sediment and runoff source <br />areas. Both suspended-sediment and bedload samples were collected in <br />order to determine transport rates at several locations in the basin from <br />which source areas were determined. <br />The suspended-sediment concentration was plotted against water <br />discharge and the relation was used to predict long-term suspended- <br />sediment transport rates. The method used to determine the transport <br />rates was a modification of a load calculation used by DeLong (1977). <br />The transport rates, supplemented by previously collected data, were used <br />to delineate suspended-sediment source areas. <br />The bedload samples were collected with a Helley-Smith sampler. <br />These samples were compared to the Einstein bedload function to determine <br />the reliability of the Helley-Smith sampler. The results showed the <br />bedload transport rate measured by the Helley-Smith sampler was greater <br />than that determined by the Einstein bedload function for the East Fork <br />and Big Sandy River data, which have a smaller range of sediment sizes. <br />For rivers or streams where there was a large range of sediment sizes <br />with very little sediment in the median range the inverse was true. <br />By combining the suspended-sediment and bedload data, total trans- <br />port rates were determined. These transport rates were then compared to <br />the Colby method of determining total load. The Colby method gave <br />greater transport rates at high flows and smaller transport rates at low <br />flows than the measured total transport rates. The difference between <br />the Colby method and the measured total transport ranged from -29.2 <br />percent at high flows to +42.6 percent at low flows. <br />The Big Sandy River basin was divided into two areas for determina- <br />tion of sources of sediment and runoff because of the control by the Big <br />Sandy Reservoir. The area upstream from the reservoir receives most of <br />its sediment from the bed and the banks as the river flows from its <br />headwaters to the reservoir. Run.off increased by 1 percent, but the <br />sediment transport increased by 98 percent between stations 09212500, Big <br />Sandy River at Leckie Ranch, near Big Sandy, and 09213500, Big Sandy <br />River near Farson. Erodible bedrock and the sparse vegetation cover <br />associated with a semiarid climate were factors contributing to the <br />sediment increase. <br />Although the Big Sandy River downstream from the reservoir is <br />widened by irrigation return flows, the river has very little sediment <br />load upstream from the confluence with Little Sandy Creek. Downstream <br />from Little Sandy Creek, there is a large increase in both runoff and <br />sediment load. The sediment comes mainly from the Pacific Creek drainage <br />basin. The major causes of the large sediment load in Pacific Creek are <br />the erodible basin material and the semiarid climate. <br />49