My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8259
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
8259
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:34 PM
Creation date
5/20/2009 10:53:21 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
8259
Author
Kircher, J. E.
Title
Sediment Transport and Source Areas of Sediment and Runoff, Big Sandy River Basin, Wyoming.
USFW Year
1982.
USFW - Doc Type
Water-Resources Investigations 81-72,
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
60
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
These factors, although not all related to the geology, may be used <br />together to partly explain the increase in sediment runoff between sta- <br />tions 09212500 and 09213500. The stream flows through an area of a more <br />erodible material after flowing from the glaciated terrain where the <br />sediment load is small. Where the stream flows through the area of more <br />erodible material, the pattern of the stream changes from a straight <br />channel to a meandering channel, and the stream becomes more sinuous as <br />it flows toward the Big Sandy Reservoir. As the stream flows toward the <br />reservoir, it has a large capacity for sediment, but very little sediment <br />is supplied by the ephemeral tributaries from watershed runoff. There- <br />fore, the easily erodible banks and bed are the main sources of sediment <br />for the stream. <br />The Pacific Creek drainage basin shows a similar occurrence of bank <br />wasting. The area drained by Pacific Creek contains mostly siltstone, <br />sandstone, and mudstone, all of which are easily eroded, but this alone <br />may not be a significant contributing factor. Some return flow from <br />irrigation, which could cause some bank instability, occurs in this <br />drainage basin, but the quantity and occurrence are small enough that <br />irrigation return flows are probably a minor part of the bank wasting. <br />Climate <br />Langbein and Schumm (1958) found that as precipitation increased, <br />annual sediment yield increased until a maximum was reached at a mean <br />annual precipitation of 12 inches. The sediment yield then decreased <br />regardless of additional precipitation. The variation in sediment yield <br />with precipitation can be explained by the interaction of precipitation <br />and vegetation on runoff and erosion. As precipitation increases from <br />zero, sediment yields increase at a rapid rate because more runoff be- <br />comes available to move sediment. However, vegetation becomes more <br />abundant as precipitation increases, holding the soil in place and pre- <br />venting its transport as sediment. <br />More than 70 percent of the Big Sandy River basin has a mean annual <br />precipitation of about 8 inches per year. This includes all the inner <br />region of the basin, which has the largest sediment production. This <br />same area also has sagebrush-type vegetation, which is not very resistant <br />to erosion. Therefore, Langbein and Schumm's relation may be used to <br />explain the erodibility in the basin. For example, Pacific Creek heads <br />in the low mountains, receives moderate precipitation and runoff, and has <br />a large sediment runoff, while the interior part of the basin receives <br />little precipitation and runoff and has little sediment runoff. <br />48
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.