Laserfiche WebLink
Sympatric Species <br />Other studies have taken a critical look at the relationship between flows and non-native species <br />year class strength (Day and Crosby 1997; Trammell and Chart 1998a; 1998b). As with these other <br />studies, the results of this study indicate a negative correlation between non-native cyprinid densities and <br />spring flows above as well as within Westwater Canyon. <br />Nonnative cyprinds were present throughout the study area. Densities of red shiners and fathead <br />minnows were lowest in the Westwater Canyon sub-reach. Sand shiner densities were low in the canyon <br />as well, but not as low as the sub-reach above the canyon. The general decrease in density ofnon-native <br />cyprinids within Westwater Canyon is due to the lack of their preferred habitat. Concurrent nursery <br />habitat investigations on the Green and Colorado Rivers (Trammel and Chart 1998a; 1998b) indicate <br />nonnative cyprinids used a variety of backwater habitat types with densities greatest in scour channel <br />backwaters. The lower densities of small bodied nonnative species presumably contribute to the success <br />of native chubs in Westwater Canyon. By comparison, densities of red shiners in Desolation Canyon f <br />were 2-3 times greater than those observed during the same time frame in Westwater Canyon (Chart and <br />Lentsch 1998). <br />An index of recruitment -Age 1 and Age 2 Gila spp Catch rates. <br />Three YOY cohorts (1992, 1993, and 1994) were tracked into their second and third growing <br />season. Chubs did not successfully reproduce in 1995. Although the 1996 cohort of YOY was the <br />strongest year class sampled, assessing recruitment of that cohort was beyond the scope of the study. <br />In Figure 12, survival to the first year appears to be best for the 1994 cohort and worst for the <br />1993 cohort. The 1994 cohort was well represented as Age 1+ fish in the electrofishing sample (21 fish / <br />of hour) despite relatively poor representation as YOY the previous year. A matrix of contributing <br />factors has been constructed to summarize the various environmental conditions (Table 18) <br />Table 18. Matrix of environmental conditions contributing to Age 0 to Age 1 Gila spp. survival in <br />Westwater Canyon, Colorado River, Utah; 1992 - 1996. <br /> COHORTS <br /> 1992 1993 1994 <br />avg TL in Fall 44,6 39.5 45 <br />rel. Density orYOY CH• med med low <br />rel. Density or NNC" med low very hi <br />avg winter now*• 2967 4029 3006 <br />first nooa••~ 44300 13600 49300 <br />* Fall densities of non-native cyprinids relative to other years of study <br />** Grand average of monthly mean flows for the winters (Nov. -Feb.) of l 992-93, ] 993-94, and ] 994- <br />95. Flows recorded by the USGS at the Near CO-UT State Line gage. <br />*** first spring peak as recorded the State Line gage subsequent to spawn <br />The 1992 and 1994 cohorts were spawned in low flow years, while the 1993 cohort was spawned <br />in above average flows. As a result, the densities of the respective cohorts and the size of individuals <br />varied greatly by late summer (Figure 12). YOY produced in 1992 and 1994 averaged 45 mm TL by mid <br />to late August and recruited relatively well to the Age 1 cohort the following summer. In contrast, chubs <br />24 <br />