Laserfiche WebLink
LIST OF FIGURES (continued) <br />Figure 21. Persistence as measured by length of time between individual captures for roundtail chub <br />tagged in Westwater Canyon 1992-1996. Sample size in legend refers to numbers offish <br />PIT tagged each year ...................................................... 54 <br />Figure 22. Daily incremental growth (mm} plotted against total length at previous capture for <br />humpback and roundtail chubs PIT tagged and recaptured in Westwater Canyon, <br />Colorado River; 1992-1996 ................................................. 55 <br />Figure 23. Length frequency analysis of humpback chub collected in Westwater Canyon (all sites <br />and.sampling techniques combined) either September or October, 1992-1996.......... 56 <br />Figure 24. Length frequency analysis of roundtail chub collected in Westwater Canyon (all sites <br />and sampling techniques combined) either September or October, 1992-1996 ......... 57 <br />Figure 25. Along term comparison of humpback and roundtail chub standardized trammel net <br />catch rates (fish/23 m net hour) with S.E. bars at three sampling sites in Westwater <br />Canyon, Colorado River; 1988 - 1996. All data collected between late August and early <br />October ................................................................. 58 <br />Appendix Figure 1. Length-weight relationships for humpback and roundtail chub collected in <br />Westwater Canyon, Colorado River, 1992-1996, during the present study (top <br />graphs) compared with pre-project data collected by the UDWR 1987-1989. <br />Regression statistics of log-log transformed data are included .............. 74 <br />ix <br />