My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8132
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
8132
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:33 PM
Creation date
5/20/2009 10:50:49 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
8132
Author
Lieberman, D. and T. Burke.
Title
Limnology and Drift of Particulate Organic Matter Through the Lower Colorado River.
USFW Year
1991.
USFW - Doc Type
Denver, CO.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
88
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
INTRODUCTION <br />Particulate organic matter (POM) supports the base <br />of the food web in many aquatic systems and is one <br />of many factors that determines the nature of biotic <br />communities in a riverine ecosystem (Vannote et al., <br />1980 [1 ]).' The POM consists of both living and dead <br />material, such as plankton in impoundments or small <br />plant fragments, brought into the river from local <br />agricultural fields. The POM provides a trophic <br />connection between microbial assemblages and <br />macroconsumers (Kondratieff and Simmons, 1985 <br />[21). Impoundments created by dams on the main- <br />stem of rivers trap sediment and organic material <br />drifting into them (Petts, 1984 [31). <br />The lower Colorado River from Laughlin, Nevada to <br />the international border (between the United States <br />and Mexico) has six mainstem dams and is one of <br />the most regulated river systems in North America. <br />Impoundments like Lake Mohave and Lake Havasu <br />(on the Colorado River) block downstream sediment <br />transport (Lara and Sanders, 1970 [4]; Prentki et al., <br />1981 [5]). While some investigators tend to stress <br />the negative aspects of such alterations in free- <br />flowing rivers (Ward and Stanford, 1979 [6]; Baxter, <br />1977 [7]; Krenkel et al., 1979 [81), other researchers <br />report that sediment trapping by upstream dams has <br />allowed for an increase of fishes, albeit exotics, to <br />inhabit the lower Colorado River (Dill, 1944 [9]; <br />Minckley, 1979 [10]; Burke, 1986 [11]). Burke <br />reported that sediment load reduction near Parker <br />Dam resulted in: <br />• Increased diversity of substrates for colonization <br />by invertebrates <br />• Decreased turbidity with corresponding <br />increased light penetration and phytoplankton <br />production <br />• A general reduction in the deleterious effects of <br />suspended sediments upon aquatic organisms and <br />their eggs <br />Minckley (1979 [10]; 1982 [121) reported that the <br />lower Colorado River system had a detritus-based <br />trophic economy. He described the food web as being <br />based upon autochthonous material. Minckley <br />credited the movement of plankton and seston from <br />reservoirs as an important source of this material. <br />The purpose of this investigation was to conduct a <br />detailed analysis of the lower Colorado River to <br />determine the amount of organic matter being trans- <br />ported through the system, and to determine how <br />dams and structures affect the transport of organic <br />material. The major question was: "If the Colorado <br />1 Numbers in brackets refer to the bibliography. <br />River dams were truly blocking organic transport <br />through the lower river system, why is there still <br />a detrital-based trophic economy, and why are there <br />more detritivorous fishes in the lower river reaches?" <br />It appears, from a fishery standpoint, the river <br />functions as a free-flowing river continuum despite <br />the six mainstem dams. <br />The two objectives of this study were: (1) in phase <br />1 to determine the quantity, composition, and <br />distribution of the particulate organic matter in the <br />river; and (2) in phase 2, to determine the origin <br />or sources of the POM. The information is required <br />to better understand how reservoirs, backwaters, <br />and irrigation diversions and return flows impact the <br />overall trophic economy of the lower Colorado River. <br />Management Implications <br />Drift of POM (particulate organic matter) through the <br />lower Colorado River is examined in detail to <br />investigate the distribution and source of this organic <br />matter. The lower Colorado River is a regulated river <br />system with reservoirs, diversion dams, riprapped <br />banks, and agricultural drains. Study results have <br />shown that despite these constructed civil structures <br />and alterations to the natural environment, POM <br />concentrations increased from upstream to down- <br />stream-not unlike an unregulated river. Fishery <br />managers and project planners who are involved in <br />channeling, riprapping, or otherwise altering a river <br />channel may use this study to better understand the <br />distribution and source of POM that supports <br />detritivorous fishes in an impounded river. <br />METHODS <br />Study Area <br />As shown on figure 1, the lower Colorado. River <br />meanders for 410 kilometers through the Mohave <br />Desert of Nevada, Arizona, and California, and <br />extends into the most arid portion of the Sonoran <br />Desert. The area receives less than 120 millimeters <br />of rainfall per year; during summer, air temperatures <br />often exceed 40 °C. Much of the sparse rainfall <br />comes in heavy rainstorms; erosion is evident in the <br />poor quality soil. Eventually, floodplain deposits of <br />fine sand and silt reach the river by way of desert <br />washes. Natural vegetation is greatly modified by <br />agricultural practices and stream bank alterations. <br />The Colorado River has only two tributaries: the Bill <br />Williams River (near Lake Havasu City, Ariz.) and <br />the Gila River (near Yuma, Ariz.). Six major dams <br />are within the study area. <br />1. Davis Dam formed Lake Mohave and began <br />storage in January 1950; it is the uppermost dam
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.