My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9582
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
9582
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:36 PM
Creation date
5/20/2009 10:49:32 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9582
Author
U.S. Bureau of Reclamation.
Title
Final Environmental Impact Statement - Navajo Reservoir Operations Volume III Comments and Responses.
USFW Year
2006.
USFW - Doc Type
Grand Junction - Durango, CO.
Copyright Material
NO
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
608
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Volume III - Comments and Responses <br />FEIS - Navajo Reservoir Operations <br />analysis of resource impacts, the hydrology studies have included all existing water uses <br />and future water uses that are authorized and that are in compliance with the Endangered <br />Species Act (ESA). This gives a more accurate picture of river and reservoir conditions in <br />the future under the alternatives considered. <br />(b) The DEIS should specify more precisely the relationship among the Navajo Nation <br />Irrigation Project (NIIP), the Animas-La Plata Project (ALP Project), and Navajo <br />Reservoir Operations in the baseline(s), under the No Action Alternative, and <br />elsewhere. Should the analysis for the modified operation of Navajo Reservoir be <br />included within the EIS for the ALP Project and all negative impacts be included <br />as costs of the ALP Project, instead of the ALP Project being a benefit to Navajo <br />Reservoir reoperation? <br />Response: Operation of Navajo Reservoir is a connected action to the ALP Project and <br />other water resource activities in the San Juan River Basin (Basin), such as the NIIP. These <br />connections stem from: <br />? Past ESA consultations that established and relied upon the San Juan River Basin <br />Recovery Implementation Program (SJRBRIP) and listed certain reasonable and <br />prudent alternatives (RPA) to avoid jeopardy to the endangered species in <br />question <br />? San Juan River flow recommendations developed and approved by the SJRBRIP in <br />1998 and the report finalized in 1999 <br />? The 1999 ESA consultation for NIIP (Blocks 9-11), including operation of Navajo <br />Reservoir, to meet these flow recommendations as a project element <br />? Reclamation's previous commitment to operate Navajo Reservoir for the benefit of <br />endangered fish in the Basin below Navajo Dam as requested in the 1991 and 1995 <br />Biological Opinions as part of the RPA for the ALP Project <br />? Conservation measures for the ALP Project listed in the 2000 ALP Biological <br />Opinion <br />In chapter I, " V. Connected and Related Actions," Reclamation states that Navajo Reservoir <br />Operations constitute a connected action to other water resource projects in the Basin, <br />including the ALP Project and NIIP, and explains their connection. <br />The change in operation of Navajo Dam is not dependent upon completion of ESA <br />consultations for the ALP Project and NIIP. However, full completion and operation of <br />these projects is dependent on the reoperation of Navajo Dam to meet the Flow <br />Recommendations. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.