Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />30 <br /> <br /> <br />en 20 <br />z <br />a: <br />LL <br />LL <br />a <br />a::: <br />w <br />CD <br />:L <br />~ 10 <br /> <br />o <br />0.30 <br /> <br />0.35 <br /> <br />0.40 0.45 0.50 0.55 0.60 <br />RATIO OF RIVER WIDTH. W2/WO <br /> <br />0.65 <br /> <br />0.70 <br /> <br />Figure 4. Ratio of river width in the most tightly <br />constricted part of a rapid to an average unconstricted <br />channel width upstream of the rapid. <br /> <br />In the first decade after dam closure, 27 percent of <br />the tributary fans had built outward because of tribu- <br />tary flooding: 10 percent had built outward by more <br />than 49 ft (Howard and Dolan 1976). In the additional <br />12 years until 1986, severe changes (defined here to <br />involve emplacement of boulders on the order of 3 ft <br />diameter into the main channel occupied when dischar- <br />ges are less than 30,000 cfs) have occurred in enough <br />of the tributary canyons to lead us to believe that, on <br />the time scale of decades, major changes will take <br />place in the rapids. <br /> <br />Median, mean, and peak discharges through the Grand <br />Canyon have been significantly altered by the construc- <br />tion and operation of Glen Canyon Dam (Dolan et al. <br />1974). Maximum powerplant discharges are about 30,000 <br />cfs and, prior to the filling of Lake Powell to oper- <br />ational level, these discharges were generally not <br />exceeded. Only since 1983 have the peak discharges (up <br />to 92,000 cfs) approached the pre-dam annual spring <br />flood levels (80,000 to 125,000 cfs). The large, rare <br />floods that widened the river channel in the vicinity <br />of the debris fans (estimated by Kieffer [1985] to have <br /> <br />25 <br />